Effects of different fertilizer reduction techniques on yield and quality of facility amaranth

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.23.013

Abstract

Abstract: Aiming at the excessive application of chemical fertilizers in the production of facility leafy vegetables, the effects of four fertilizer reduction techniques on amaranth yield and quality in Wuhan were studied. The fertilizer reduction techniques included soil testing and formulated fertilization（T2）, organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer（T3）, organic small molecule water soluble fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer（T4） and fertigation technology（T5）. The results showed that T4, T3, T2 and T5 treatments increased yield by 10.59%, 4.07%, 2.36% and 5.06% per hectare compared with farmers’ conventional fertilization （T1 treatment）. Compared with conventional fertilization, the contents of soluble sugar, protein and VC of different fertilizer reduction techniques were significantly increased, while the content of nitrate was decreased. The nutritional quality of Amaranth in T3 and T4 treatments was the best. In terms of cumulative nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake of Amaranth, T4 treatment was significantly higher than T1 treatment, T3 and T1 treatments had no significant difference, T2 and T5 treatments were significantly lower than T1 treatment. The above results indicated that under the conditions of this experiment, organic small molecule water-soluble fertilizer substitution technology had the best effect of reducing fertilizer application and increasing efficiency.

Key words: amaranth in greenhouses, reducing chemical fertilizer, organic fertilizer replacement, yield, quality

CLC Number:

S636.4

DU Lei, SUN Xiong-jun, CHEN Li-ping, WANG Su-ping, ZHANG Gui-you, HUANG Xiang, JIANG Li, CHENG Wei-shun, LUO Xi, LIU Xin, HONG Juan, CHEN Hong. Effects of different fertilizer reduction techniques on yield and quality of facility amaranth[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(23): 74-77.

References

[1] 方志权,顾海英,于冷.中国城市蔬菜产业综合竞争力的内涵特征和评价标准[J].上海农业学报,2003,19(3):5-8.
[2] TI C P, LUO Y X, YAN X Y.Characteristics of nitrogen balance in open-air and greenhouse vegetable cropping systems of China[J]. Environmental science & pollution research, 2015, 22:18508-18518.
[3] WANG X Z, ZOU C Q, ZHANG Y Q, et al.Environmental impacts of pepper(Capsicum annuum L.)production affected by nutrient management:A case study in southwest China[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 171:934-943.
[4] SHI W M, YAO J, YAN F.Vegetable cultivation under greenhouse conditions leads to rapid accumulation of nutrients, acidification and salinity of soils and groundwater contaminations in south—eastern China[J].Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2009, 83:73-84.
[5] GUO J H,LIU X J, ZHANG Y,et al.Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J].Science,2010,327(5968):1008-1010.
[6] 黄绍文,高伟,唐继伟,等.我国主要菜区耕层土壤盐分总量及离子组成[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(4):965-977.
[7] 黄绍文,唐继伟,李春花.不同栽培方式菜田耕层土壤重金属状况[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(3):708-719.
[8] 高祥照. 我国测土配方施肥进展情况与发展方向[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2008,29(1):7-10.
[9] 侯云鹏,李前,孔丽丽,等. 不同缓/控释氮肥对春玉米氮素吸收利用、土壤无机氮变化及氮平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3928-3940.
[10] 黄庆,刘忠珍,刘景业,等. 有机肥部分替代化肥与化肥减施对土壤、菜心产量和品质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学,2020,47(5):60-65.
[11] 张红梅,金海军,丁小涛,等. 水肥一体化对大棚土壤生态及黄瓜生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报,2019,35(1):1-6.
[12] 吴时敏. 苋菜的开发利用[J]. 农村实用工程技术,1993(3):29-30.
[13] 李正应. 稀有蔬菜栽培技术[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2000.
[14] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.
[15] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[16] 任科宇,徐明岗,张露,等. 我国不同区域粮食作物产量对有机肥施用的响应差异[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(1):143-150.