Analysis of the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecological footprint and economic decoupling effect in Anhui Province

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.22.035

Abstract

Abstract: Taking Anhui Province as the research object, the spatial and temporal changes of ecological footprint in Anhui Province between 2005 and 2020 was studied by using the ecological footprint analysis method and the decoupling theory. The results showed that, from the time dimension, the ecological footprint and ecological deficit in Anhui Province from 2005 to 2020 showed a changing trend of increasing first and then decreasing, and reached its peak in 2014. However, the ecological capacity didn’t show a significant chang, and always maintained a steady increase; from the spatial dimension, the ecological deficit and ecological footprint in northern Anhui Province from 2005 to 2020 were far greater than those in the southern region, and Fuyang, Bozhou, Suzhou and other places in northern Anhui had always maintained a high ecological footprint and ecological deficit; from the state of decoupling of economic development and resources and environment, Anhui Province mainly had strong decoupling and weak decoupling from 2005 to 2020, and after 2015, there was an alternation phenomenon of strong and weak decoupling. On the basis of this analysis, the sustainable development of Anhui Province was realized by taking measures of improving the regional ecological capacity, optimizing the energy structure and reducing the personal ecological footprint.

Key words: ecological footprint, ecological capacity, ecological deficit, decoupling, Anhui Province

CLC Number:

F205
X24

GUO Zhen-zhen. Analysis of the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecological footprint and economic decoupling effect in Anhui Province[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(22): 200-208.

References

[1] COSTANZA R.The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological economics,2000,32(3):341-345.
[2] 杨开忠. 生态足迹分析理论与方法[J]. 地球科学进展,2000, 15(6):630-636.
[3] 翁伯琦,王义祥,黄毅斌,等.福建省生态足迹和生态承载力的动态变化[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(11):2153-2157.
[4] 张可云,傅帅雄,张文彬.基于改进生态足迹模型的中国31个省级区域生态承载力实证研究[J].地理科学,2011,31(9):1084-1089.
[5] OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressures from economic growth[R]. Paris: OECD, 2002.
[6] VEHMAS J, KAIVO-OJA J, LUUKKANEN J.Global trends of linking environmental stress and economic growth[R]. Turku: Tutu Publication, 2003.6-9.
[7] 盖美,胡杭爱,柯丽娜.长江三角洲地区资源环境与经济增长脱钩分析[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(2):185-198.
[8] 钟太洋,黄贤金,王柏源.经济增长与建设用地扩张的脱钩分析[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(1):18-31.
[9] 吴丹, 王亚华.中国经济发展与水环境压力脱钩态势评价与展望[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(9):1103-1109.
[10] LU I J, LIN S J, LEWIS C.Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany,Japan and South Korea[J]. Energy policy,2007,35(6):3226-3235.
[11] REES W E.Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:What urban economics leaves out[J].Environment and urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130.
[12] WACKERNAGEL M,YOUNT J D.The ecological footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional sustainability[J]. Environmental monitoring and assessment,1998,51(1-2):511-529.
[13] 张新. 武汉市生态可持续发展的分析与评价[J].统计与决策,2007(3):81-83.
[14] 黄云晟. 基于生态足迹模型的百色市生态可持续发展研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2016.
[15] 杨屹,樊明东,张景乾.陕西省区域生态足迹动态变化及驱动因素差异研究[J].生态科学,2018,37(3):67-76.
[16] 胡雪萍,李丹青.城镇化进程中生态足迹的动态变化及影响因素分析——以安徽省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016, 25(2):300-306.
[17] REES W E,WACKERNAGEL M.FORUM:Monetary analysis:Turning a blind eye on sustainability[J]. Ecological economics,1999,29(1):47-52.
[18] 曹文亚,潘洪义,巫泽倩,等.基于生态足迹模型的耕地脆弱性分布差异研究——以德阳市为例[J].四川师范大学学报( 自然科学版),2020,43(3):393-402.
[19] 薛若晗. 基于三维生态足迹模型的福建省耕地资源评价[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(19):59-62.
[20] 薛若晗. 生态足迹模型视角下的福建省可持续发展评价[J].合肥学院学报( 综合版),2017,34( 2):16-19,50.
[21] 世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].王之佳,柯金良,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.100-200.
[22] 顾晓薇,王青,刘建兴,等.辽宁省自然资源可持续利用的生态足迹分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(4):118-124.
[23] 刘某承,李文华.基于净初级生产力的中国各地生态足迹均衡因子测算[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):401-406.
[24] TAPIO P.Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport policy, 2005, 12(2): 137-151.