Research on the coordination relationship between urbanization level and green economy development level in China

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.17.011

Abstract

Abstract: In the process of China’s urbanization construction, due to the economic growth as the main goal, the quality of development is ignored in the development process, and even to a certain extent, there is a phenomenon of reverse urbanization. In order to better study the coordination relationship between the development level of green economy and the development level of new urbanization, the evaluation index system and the coupling coordination model of the development level of green economy and the development level of new urbanization are constructed, and the questionnaire survey was used to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. This model finds that both the development level of green economy and the development level of new urbanization have improved significantly, but there is an unbalanced regional development. The development level of green economy continues to lag, and the gap between the coordinated development levels of various regions is gradually narrowing.

Key words: urbanization, green economy, coordinated development

CLC Number:

F299.21
F424

YANG Chun. Research on the coordination relationship between urbanization level and green economy development level in China[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(17): 81-87.

References

[1] ZHANG S,WANG S,YUAN L,et al.The impact of epidemics on agricultural production and forecast of COVID-19[J].China agricultural economic review,2020,12(3):136-148.
[2] SICHE R.What is the impact of COVID-19 disease on agriculture?[J]. Scientia agropecuaria,2020, 11(1): 3-6.
[3] LAL R, BREVIK E C, DAWSON L, et al.Managing soils for recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Soil systems, 2020,4:46.
[4] FARNESE P L.Soil governance in a pandemic[J].Soil security,2022,25(6):1023-1234.
[5] CHEN Y H, GLYMOUR M, RILEY A, et al.Excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic among Californians 18-65 years of age, by occupational sector and occupation:March through November 2020[J]. PLoS ONE,2021,16(6):e0252454.
[6] CHICAS R, XIUHTECUTLI N, HOUSER M, et al.COVID-19 and agricultural workers: A descriptive study[J]. Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2022, 24(1):58-64.
[7] TALUKDER B,LOON G V,HIPEL K W, et al.COVID-19's implications on agri-food systems and human health in Bangladesh[J]. Current research in environmental sustainability,2021,3:100033.
[8] EROKHIN V,GAO T.Impacts of COVID-19 on trade and economic aspects of food security: Evidence from 45 developing countries[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(16): 5775.
[9] NOLTE K, SIPANGULE K, WENDT N.Agricultural households in times of crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic, livelihoods and land-use decisions[J]. Journal of land use science, 2022,17(1):134-160.
[10] 金泉,李辉文,苏庆新,等. 新冠肺炎疫情突发事件对中小微企业企业家信心的影响及对策——基于中国企业创新创业调查(ESIEC)数据库的分析[J]. 产业经济评论,2020(2):49-58.
[11] 王靖一,郭峰,李勇国.新冠肺炎疫情对线下微型商户短期冲击的定量估算——兼论数字金融缓解冲击的价值[R].北京:北京大学数字金融研究中心,2020.
[12] 吴先华,曹诗语,谭玲,等.基于动态CGE模型的COVID-19疫情灾害综合经济损失评估研究[J].中国软科学,2020(12):33-44.
[13] CONTRERAS-GONZALEZ I, SIWATU G O, PALACIOS-LOPEZ A, et al.The labor market impacts of COVID-19 in four African countries (April to October 2020)[R]. World bank publications,2020.
[14] SPRINGMANN M,CLARK M,MASON-D'CROZ D. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits[J].Nature, 2018, 562:519-525.
[15] LUO R F, LIU C F, GAO J J, et al.Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural poverty and policy responses in China[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2020,19(12): 2946-2964.
[16] BALANA B B, OYEYEMI M A, OGUNNIYI A I, et al.The effects of COVID-19 policies on livelihoods and food security of smallholder farm households in Nigeria: Descriptive results from a phone survey[M]. Washington: International food policy research institute,2020.
[17] 彭小珈. 农村电商发展效率及影响因素研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2020.