Study on ecological compensation standard based on opportunity cost and ecosystem service value accounting：A case study of Xin’an river basin

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.21.033

Abstract

Abstract: Ecological compensation is an innovative environmental policy, which can improve the quality of ecological environment and enhance the basin’s capacity for sustainable development by coordinating the economic interests of all subjects. Thus, it’s of great importance to research on ecological compensation standard according to local conditions. Taking Xin’an river basin as an example, this paper firstly carried out the opportunity cost of Huangshan city in the upper reaches of the river basin, then calculated the total ecosystem service value according to the revised compensation factor of Xin’an river basin on the basis of defining the compensation range of ecosystem service function in the basin, and finally introduced the development stage coefficient model to determine the threshold value of ecological compensation standard. The results show that the lower limit of ecological compensation in Xin’an river basin from 2013 to 2017 is 0.524 billion~1.265 billion yuan, and the upper limit of ecological compensation is 2.406 billion~3.422 billion yuan. Based on the results and the current situation of ecological compensation and the needs of economic and social development, some countermeasures and suggestions for determining ecological compensation standard, rising compensation funds and building the legal system of river basin in the future are put forword.

Key words: ecological compensation standard, opportunity cost, ecosystem service value, Xin'an river basin

CLC Number:

X321

DAI Jia-yuan, HU Shu-heng, ZHANG Bei-er, YANG Qing. Study on ecological compensation standard based on opportunity cost and ecosystem service value accounting：A case study of Xin’an river basin[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(21): 152-157.

References

[1] WUNDER S, WERTZ-KANOUNNIKOFF S.Payments for ecosystem services:A new way of conserving biodiversity in forests[J]. Journal of sustainable forestry, 2009, 28(3):576-596.
[2] 蒋毓琪, 陈珂. 流域生态补偿研究综述[J]. 生态经济(中文版), 2016, 32(4):175-180.
[3] HECKEN G V, BASTIAENSEN J.Payments for ecosystem services:Justified or not?A political view[J]. Environmental science and policy,2010, 13(8):785-792.
[4] 曾明华. 关于机会成本的几点认识[J].漳州师院学报(哲学社会科学版), 1998(3):68-71.
[5] 李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华, 等. 生态补偿标准确定的主要方法及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(8):4431-4440.
[6] WÜNSCHER T, ENGEL S, WUNDER S. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services:A tool for boosting conservation benefits[J]. Ecological economics,2008, 65(4):822-833.
[7] 唐萍萍, 胡仪元. 南水北调中线工程汉江水源地生态补偿计量模型构建[J]. 统计与决策,2015(16):42-45.
[8] 李屹峰, 罗玉珠, 郑华, 等. 青海省三江源自然保护区生态移民补偿标准[J]. 生态学报, 2013(3):101-107.
[9] COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[10] 刘春腊, 刘卫东, 徐美. 基于生态价值当量的中国省域生态补偿额度研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014(1):150-157.
[11] 高振斌, 王小莉, 苏婧, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018(6):86-93.
[12] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015(8):1243-1254.
[13] 杨爱平, 杨和焰. 国家治理视野下省际流域生态补偿新思路——以皖、浙两省的新安江流域为例[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2015(3):9-15.
[14] 严厚福. 流域生态补偿机制的合理构建[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,14(2):40-47.
[15] 李坦, 范玉楼. 新安江流域生态补偿标准核算模型研究[J]. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,20(6):71-77.
[16] 聂伟平, 陈东风. 新安江流域(第二轮)生态补偿试点进展及机制完善探索[J]. 环境保护,2017(7):19-23.
[17] 李怀恩, 谢元博, 史淑娟, 等. 基于防护成本法的水源区生态补偿量研究——以南水北调中线工程水源区为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009(5):161-164.
[18] 李金昌. 价值核算是环境核算的关键[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2002(3):13-19.
[19] 赵海燕. 安徽省生态系统服务价值核算及其影响因子研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2019.
[20] 张婷婷. 安徽省土地利用变化及对生态系统服务价值影响的实证研究[J]. 西部大开发(土地开发工程研究),2019,4(11):49-53.
[21] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.