Evaluation on county development level under the background of characteristic towns cultivation：Take Shandong province as an example

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.16.048

Abstract

Abstract: As an important part of the new urbanization and rural revitalization strategy,the cultivation of characteristic towns must be based on the development level and resources endowment of the county. The comprehensive evaluation index system of county development level was constructed from three dimensions of economic development, social service and ecological environment. The development level of counties （cities and districts） of 21 national characteristic towns in Shandong province was quantitatively measured and objectively classified by using entropy method and cluster analysis method. The results showed that,the development of 21 counties （cities and districts） exist problems of dual imbalances. One was the unbalanced development among the eastern areas,central Yimeng areas and inland remote areas; the other was the unbalanced development among economic development,social service and ecological environment. In order to promote the coordinated development of counties and improve the planning construction of characteristic towns, it was necessary to scientifically plan the layout of county competitiveness,optimize the resources allocation of characteristic towns; deeply excavate the industrial characteristic, condense the core competitiveness of characteristic towns,and strengthen the innovation carriers status of characteristic towns under the promotion of concept and technological innovation.

Key words: new urbanization, rural revitalization strategy, characteristic towns, county development level evaluation, Shandong province

CLC Number:

F327

LIU Xuan, ZHANG Miao, LI Yan-ni, JIA Ji-ming, WANG Jie. Evaluation on county development level under the background of characteristic towns cultivation：Take Shandong province as an example[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(16): 211-216.

References

[1] 凌飞鸿. 关于全域旅游助推县域经济发展的思考[J].经济研究导刊,2017(8):84-85.
[2] 朱宝莉,刘晓鹰.全域旅游视域下民族特色小镇发展策略研究[J].农业经济,2019(3):15-17.
[3] 宋利利,周凯,曹娓,等.新乡市特色小镇发展现状、问题及对策研究[J].河南科技学院学报,2019,39(1):30-34.
[4] 彭建强. 推动县域经济高质量发展[N/OL].河北日报,http://m.hebnews.cn/hebei/2019-02/01/content_7344140.htm,2019-02-01.
[5] 方应波,易文芳,黄炜迦.产业升级视角下广东省特色小镇发展路径研究[J].经济论坛,2019(1):73-77.
[6] 张国强,王洪冉,张浩.河北省县城建设扩容提质路径研究[J].合作经济与科技,2019(2):50-51.
[7] 成丹. 新常态下县域经济发展量化评价及协调度分析——以辽宁为例[J].经济研究参考,2017(29):106-112.
[8] 陆传豪,刘刚才,代富强,等.甘孜州农牧区县域发展水平综合评价与特征分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(11):84-93.
[9] 高延芳. 云南县域经济发展评价模型构建与实证分析——基于SEM模型[J].商业经济研究,2017(10):209-211.
[10] 熊春林,彭杰,张娟,等.湖南洞庭湖生态经济区县域发展成果评价研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(5):106-112.
[11] 姚云霞,管卫华,王馨,等.基于物元模型的江苏省县域综合发展水平评价与区域差异研究[J].南京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,40(1):104-111,119.
[12] 陈文博,余国新,朱美玲.基于地理学视角的县域综合竞争力评价——以新疆天山北坡经济带县域为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(6):104-111.
[13] 孔雷,刘文国,张良,等.县域生态文明建设评价指标体系的构建研究——以普洱市为例[J].林业经济,2016,38(3):30-33.
[14] 王际科,杨正丽,杜小军.基于循环修正模式的县域经济社会发展评价模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2015,45(20):26-34.
[15] 唐石. 县域经济竞争力评价研究和提升对策——以江苏省为例[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2015,14(4):26-32.
[16] 吴一洲,陈前虎,郑晓虹.特色小镇发展水平指标体系与评估方法[J].规划师,2016,32(7):123-127.
[17] 贺建军,张维维.我国县域城市品质评价指标体系构建与实际测度——以浙江省慈溪市为例[J].现代城市研究,2014(2):9-14.
[18] 辛岭,王济民.我国县域农业现代化发展水平评价——基于全国1980个县的实证分析[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(6):673-678.
[19] 时雨晴,钟林生,陈田.中国陆地边境县域旅游竞争力评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(6):1133-1141.
[20] 钟华,孙保平.河北省张家口地区县域协调发展评价研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(3):363-367.
[21] 杜挺,谢贤健,梁海艳,等.基于AHP法的宜宾市县域城镇化发展水平综合评价[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(3):499-503.
[22] 周隽,王志强,沈月琴,等.浙江山区县域经济社会协调发展评价[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(6):965-973.
[23] 李晓园,陈武.我国县域经济包容性增长评价及启示——基于苏赣陕三省的数据分析[J].江西社会科学,2014,34(9):44-50.
[24] 崔慧广. 县域基本公共教育服务均等化:分析框架、评价指标与测算方法[J].教育理论与实践,2014,34(31):18-22.
[25] 丛新萍. 安徽省县域经济竞争力评价研究[D].安徽蚌埠:安徽财经大学,2012.
[26] 辛金国,刘奇,沙培锋.浙江省特色小镇高质量发展评价研究[J].统计科学与实践,2018(10):9-12,37.
[27] 乌力雅苏,严良,张龙.资源型县域绿色矿业评价研究——以河南嵩县为例[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(4):238-243.