湖北农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 77-83.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2024.05.014

• 园艺·特产 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同品种玫瑰花及花蕾气味的电子鼻分析

王淑, 郭瑞齐, 赵秋晨, 王平, 孙新茹, 王萌   

  1. 山东省中医药研究院,济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-05 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 王 萌(1980-),女,山东济南人,副研究员,在读博士研究生,主要从事药食同源产品研发及理论研究工作,(电话)18663712080(电子信箱)15262698@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:王 淑(1996-),女,山东济南人,研究实习员,硕士,主要从事中药资源与质量控制的研究工作,(电话)18560228023(电子信箱)2896815226@qq.com;
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)项目“药食同源特色产品创新研发与应用示范”(2021SFGC1205); 山东省2022年度中医药新产品研发推广项目“女性特殊生理时期药食同源产品的研发推广”

Electronic nose analysis on scent of different varieties of rose flowers and buds

WANG Shu, GUO Rui-qi, ZHAO Qiu-chen, WANG Ping, SUN Xin-ru, WANG Meng   

  1. Shandong Academy of Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2024-02-05 Published:2024-05-25 Online:2024-06-04

摘要: 以玫瑰花及花蕾为试验材料,采用电子鼻技术,通过聚类分析、主成分分析(Principal Component Analysis,PCA)、正交偏最小二乘法判别分析(Orthogonal Partial Least-squares Discriminant Analysis,OPLS-DA)等多元统计学方法,研究了不同品种玫瑰花及花蕾的气味特征。结果表明,14个品种玫瑰花被分为三类,组间差异标志物为W1W、W5S、W2S,即无机硫化物、氮氧化合物、醇醚醛酮类,3种差异标志物的强度大小为1组>2组>3组,均具有显著差异;8个品种玫瑰的花蕾被分为三类,组间差异标志物为W5S、W1W,即氮氧化合物、无机硫化物,两种差异标志物的强度大小为1组>2组>3组,均具有显著差异;玫瑰花与花蕾的挥发性成分含量存在差异,大部分玫瑰的花蕾挥发性成分含量高于玫瑰花,少部分玫瑰花蕾挥发性成分含量低于玫瑰花或成分含量差异不大,且主要差异标志物为W1W、W5S、W2S、W2W,即无机硫化物、氮氧化合物、醇醚醛酮类和有机硫化物。通过电子鼻技术可快速有效区分不同品种玫瑰花和花蕾的挥发性成分差异,可为玫瑰香气研究和质量评价提供参考。

关键词: 玫瑰花, 玫瑰花蕾, 气味, 电子鼻

Abstract: With rose flowers and buds as test materials, the electronic nose technology was used to investigate the scent characteristics of different varieties of rose flowers and buds through multivariate statistical methods such as cluster analysis, Principal Component Analysis(PCA)and Orthogonal Partial Least-squares Discriminant Analysis(OPLS-DA). The results showed that, 14 varieties of roses were divided into three categories, and the difference markers among the groups were W1W, W5S, and W2S, namely inorganic sulfides, nitrogen oxides, alcohol ether aldehydes and ketones. The intensity of the three difference markers was group 1 > group 2 > group 3, all of which had significant differences. The flower buds of 8 rose varieties were divided into three categories, and the difference markers among the groups were W5S and W1W, that was, nitrogen oxides and inorganic sulfides. The intensity of the two difference markers was group 1 > group 2 > group 3, all of which had significant differences. There were differences in the content of volatile components between rose flowers and buds. Most rose buds had higher content of volatile components than rose flowers, while a few rose buds had lower content of volatile components than rose flowers or had little difference in component contents. The main difference markers were W1W, W5S, W2S and W2W, that was, inorganic sulfides, nitrogen oxides, alcohol-ether aldehydes ketones, and organic sulfides. Electronic nose technology could quickly and effectively distinguish the difference of volatile components of different varieties of rose flowers and buds, and which could provide reference for rose aroma research and rose quality evaluation.

Key words: rose flower, rosebud, scent, electronic nose

中图分类号: