稻虾综合种养田浮游生物群落组成及其动态变化分析

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.07.018

湖北农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 101-106.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.07.018

稻虾综合种养田浮游生物群落组成及其动态变化分析

宋光同¹, 王芬¹, 蒋业林¹, 陈祝¹, 徐笑娜¹, 麻嘉浩², 周翔¹, 王佳佳¹, 徐彬¹, 朱士明³

1.安徽省农业科学院水产研究所/水产增养殖安徽省重点实验室,合肥 230031;
2.安徽熙岸现代农业服务有限公司,安徽太湖 246400;
3.合肥市润枝生态农业有限公司,安徽肥东 231602

收稿日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-08-15
通讯作者: 蒋业林（1963-）,男,研究员,主要从事特种水产养殖工作,（电子信箱）241468869@qq.com。
作者简介:宋光同（1979-）,男,安徽肥东人,副研究员,硕士,主要从事虾类健康养殖工作,（电话）15155117515（电子信箱）sgt7902@126.com。
基金资助:
安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目（201904a06020032）; 安徽省水产产业技术体系项目（皖农科[2016]84号）; 合肥市关键共性技术研发项目（2021GJ074）

Analysis of plankton community composition and its dynamic change in rice-crayfish field

SONG Guang-tong¹, WANG Fen¹, JIANG Ye-lin¹, CHEN Zhu¹, XU Xiao-na¹, MA Jia-hao², ZHOU Xiang¹, WANG Jia-jia¹, XU Bin¹, ZHU Shi-ming³

1. Fisheries Research Institute of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Aquaculture and Stock Enhancement for Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, China;
2 Anhui Xi'an Modern Agricultural Service Co., Ltd., Taihu 246400, Anhui, China;
3. Hefei Runzhi Ecological Agriculture Co., Ltd., Feidong 231602, Anhui, China

Received:2022-03-15 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究稻虾综合种养田浮游生物群落组成及其周年动态变化特征,定期采集浮游生物样本,检测并分析了浮游生物群落结构、多样性、种类和数量变化。结果表明,①虾沟共检出浮游植物7门125种,显著高于田面;虾沟共检出浮游动物4类57种,与田面差异不显著;绿藻门和原生动物种类数占绝对优势。②虾沟浮游植物的多样性指数、丰富度指数、均匀度指数年均值分别为1.944、2.435和0.540;其中多样性指数12月最低,9月最高;虾沟和田面多样性指数差异不显著。虾沟浮游动物多样性指数、丰富度指数、均匀度指数年均值分别为1.726、1.865、0.654,其中多样性指数4月最低,8月最高。③10月至翌年3—4月单生卵囊藻均为优势种,5—9月普通黄丝藻均为优势种,6—10月四尾栅藻均为优势种。12月和2月优势种为桡足幼体,田面3月和4月无节幼体均为优势种,虾沟4月浮游动物优势种为拟铃壳虫,5—8月池沼多核变形虫均为优势种,9—11月近亲裸腹溞均为优势种。④稻虾种养生态系统虾沟浮游植物年均密度为1 403 858 ind /L,其中3月密度最大,2月最小;年均生物量为0.155 37 mg/L,其中5月生物量最大,10月最小;虾沟浮游植物生物密度和生物量高于田面。田面浮游动物年均密度为4 248 ind/L,其中密度4月最大,2月最小;年均生物量为9.28 mg/L,其中生物量12月最大,2月最小;田面浮游动物生物密度和生物量高于虾沟。

关键词: 克氏原螯虾（Procambarus clarkii）, 稻虾种养, 浮游生物, 群落

Abstract: In order to study the plankton community composition and its annual dynamic change characteristics in the rice-crayfish field, monthly plankton samples were collected, and the structure, diversity, species and quantity of plankton community were detected and analyzed. The results showed that：①In the ditches, there were 125 species of phytoplankton in 7 phyla, significantly higher than that in field surface, and 57 species of zooplankton in 4 species were determined, which had no significant difference from the field surface; The species number of chlorophyta and protozoa were absolute dominant. ②The annual average values of diversity index, richness index and evenness index of phytoplankton in ditches which for crayfish lived were 1.944, 2.481 and 0.540, respectively; there was no significant difference in diversity index between the two fields. The diversity index, richness index and evenness index of zooplankton in ditches were 1.726, 1.865 and 0.654, respectively. The diversity index was the lowest in April and the highest in August. ③Oocystis sotilaria was dominant species from October to march and April of the following year, Tribonema vulgare Pasch was dominant species from May to September, and Scenedesmus quadricauda was dominant species from June to October. The dominant species were copepodite in December and February. The nauplii in March and April were the dominant species in the field surface, and in ditches,Tintinnopsis was dominant species in April, the dominant species were all Pelomyxa palustris Greeff. from May to August, and Moina affinis Birge. was all dominant species from September to November. ④The annual average density of phytoplankton was 1 403 858 ind/L, the annual average biomass was 0.155 37 mg/L, the density in March was the highest and in February was the minimum, the biomass in May was the highest and in October was the minimums, and the density and biomass of phytoplankton in the ditches were higher than those in the field surface. The annual density and biomass of zooplankton were 4 248 ind/L and 9.28 mg/L respectively in the field surface, the density was the highest in April and minimum in February, the biomass was the highest in December and minimum in February. The density and biomass of zooplankton in the field were higher than that in the ditch.

Key words: Procambarus clarkii, rice and shrimp farming, plankton, community

中图分类号:

Q958.8

宋光同, 王芬, 蒋业林, 陈祝, 徐笑娜, 麻嘉浩, 周翔, 王佳佳, 徐彬, 朱士明. 稻虾综合种养田浮游生物群落组成及其动态变化分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(7): 101-106.

SONG Guang-tong, WANG Fen, JIANG Ye-lin, CHEN Zhu, XU Xiao-na, MA Jia-hao, ZHOU Xiang, WANG Jia-jia, XU Bin, ZHU Shi-ming. Analysis of plankton community composition and its dynamic change in rice-crayfish field[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 62(7): 101-106.

参考文献

[1] 全国水产技术推广总站、中国水产学会、中国水产流通与加工协会.中国小龙虾产业发展报告(2021)[R].
[2] 隋燚,夏德军,石小平,等. 稻虾连作模式下稻田水体浮游生物调查研究[J]. 安徽农学通报,2018, 24(18): 43-47.
[3] 李聪,成永旭,管勤壮,等 . 用稳定性同位素技术分析稻-虾系统中不同“碳/氮”投喂方式对克氏原螯虾食性的影响[J].水产学报, 2018, 42(11): 1778-1786.
[4] CORREIA A M.Food choice by the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkia[J]. Ann Zool Fenn, 2003, 40(6):517-528.
[5] ALCORLO P,GEIGER W,OTERO M.Feeding preferencesand food selection of the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in habitats differing in food item diversity[J]. Crustaceana, 2004, 77(4): 435-453.
[6] 燕晓霎. 罗非鱼、鲮鱼及水生植物对浮游植物影响的研究[D]. 广州:暨南大学,2007.
[7] 赵秀侠,卢文轩,李静,等.安徽城东湖浮游植物群落结构与水质评价[J].生态科学, 2020, 39(5):187-196.
[8] 赵秀侠,卢文轩,梁阳阳,等.安徽三座通江湖泊秋季浮游植物群落结构特征及其影响因子[J].生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1):67-75.
[9] 宋庆洋, 米武娟,王斌梁,等.稻虾共作水体浮游植物群落结构特征分析[J].水生生物学报,2019,43(2):415-422.
[10] 喻记新, 向贤芬, 李为,等. 虾稻综合种养系统浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].生物资源,2020,42(3):279-286.
[11] 胡鸿钧,魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2006.
[12] KOSTE W.Rotatoria[M]. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger,1978.
[13] 蒋燮治,堵南山.中国动物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.
[14] 章宗涉,黄祥飞.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[15] ULANOWICZ R E.Information theory in ecology[J]. Computers chemistry, 2001, 25(4): 393-399.
[16] SHANNON C E, WEAVER W, WIENER N.The mathe-matical theory of communication[M]. Urbana, Illinois:The university of Illinois press, 1949.
[17] PIELOU E C.Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession[J]. Journal of theoretical biology, 1966, 10(2): 370-383.
[18] 杨亮杰, 余鹏飞,竺俊全, 等. 浙江横山水库浮游植物群落结构特征及其影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2):569-576.
[19] 李岩. 稻蟹共生对稻田水体浮游生物和底栖动物影响的研究[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2013.
[20] 高欣,景泓杰,赵文,等.凡纳滨对虾高位养殖池塘浮游生物群落结构及水质特征[J].大连海洋大学学报,2017,32(1):44-50.

稻虾综合种养田浮游生物群落组成及其动态变化分析

Analysis of plankton community composition and its dynamic change in rice-crayfish field

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张文宇, 戴然欣, 陈松文, 李准, 曹凑贵, 汪金平. 不同生态区稻虾种养资源投入与经济效益分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(7): 1-6.
[2]	胡展育, 周建松, 刘伟, 常征, 游春梅. 紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤动物群落结构多样性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(7): 57-62.
[3]	汪磊, 黄志强, 翟健程, 郭福生. 旅游干扰对婺源风水林植物多样性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(5): 100-106.
[4]	陈玮, 林琳, 李艳芹, 张利敏. 不同施肥方式对黑土农田弹尾目群落结构的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(4): 81-88.
[5]	邸慧慧, 王瑞, 谭军, 彭五星. 烟草连作病害土壤与连作非病害土壤的细菌群落差异性比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 47-51.
[6]	孙霞, 刘扬, 王芳, 张虎, 毛淑敏, 亓翠英. 洞庭湖区可培养细菌群落结构及其空间分布特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(7): 13-19.
[7]	李秀芳, 刘萌萌, 姬婷婷, 李泽建. 浙江凤阳山蝴蝶群落多样性变化规律研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(5): 45-55.
[8]	项卢斌, 王宇欣, 陆笑婷, 吴佳禧, 严萍, 魏冬梅, 齐鑫. 校园昆虫群落组成及其与环境因子相关性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(4): 136-140.
[9]	唐涛, 王帆帆, 郭杰, 郭晓亮, 段媛媛, 游景茂. 生防菌BZJN1及化学药剂苯甲·丙环唑对白术根际土壤养分和真菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(24): 84-89.
[10]	李卓然, 张子怡, 阮爱东, 鲁祥, 武帅. 基于高通量测序技术的新疆哈密地区盐碱地土壤细菌群落结构分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(11): 54-61.
[11]	周泽湘, 范文浩, 方刘, 阮国良, 郭小泽, 刘昕, 郑维友. 温度对克氏原螯虾幼虾生长、摄食及消化酶活性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(20): 127-130.
[12]	周金梅, 边步云, 李平, 祝延立. “玉米田养鹅”模式下的玉米植株苗期生长研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(2): 31-34.
[13]	陈佳林, 孔凡青, 余海军, 黄艳凤, 师文惠, 黄鑫, 李兵, 王茜. 白洋淀湿地浮游植物多样性分析及水质评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(19): 59-64.
[14]	张羽穆, 阮国良, 王淑娟, 方刘, 王乾, 张涵, 叶丹. 潜江市克氏原螯虾不同养殖模式的效益对比分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(14): 95-99.
[15]	诸慧琴, 徐正会, 和玉成, 何娟, 张鹏, 王亮, 张扬, 刘平. 滇东南地区蚂蚁群落结构研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(5): 113-120.