湖北农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 247-252.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.05.042

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    下一篇

宅基地“三权分置”改革对乡村振兴的影响

刘心睿, 赵伟朝   

  1. 河海大学商学院,江苏 常州 213022
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-21 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵伟朝(2001-),男,山西介休人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为宅基地制度改革、环境,(电话)19851936526(电子信箱)hhucmk@163.com。
  • 作者简介:刘心睿(2002-),女,山西临汾人,在读本科生,研究方向为大数据应用,(电话)18303578091(电子信箱)2944181832@qq.com。

The impact of “three rights separation” reform of homestead on rural revitalization

LIU Xin-rui, ZHAO Wei-chao   

  1. School of Business, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022,Jiangsu,China
  • Received:2022-03-21 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-06-12

摘要: 以全国宅基地改革33个试点地区的面板数据为基础,以农民年人均可支配收入作为被解释变量,采用DID模型比较宅基地“三权分置”改革实行后对乡村振兴的影响,并对结果进行稳健性检验和异质性分析。结果表明,宅基地“三权分置”改革对促进乡村振兴具有正向作用,但由于地区经济水平的差异及政策实施的滞后性,导致部分地区的促进效应尚不显著。

关键词: 宅基地改革, 乡村振兴, “三权分置”, 双重差分法

Abstract: Based on the panel data of 33 pilot areas of the national homestead reform, the annual per capita disposable income of farmers was used as the explanatory variable, the DID model was used to compare the impact of the “three rights separation” reform of homestead on rural revitalization, and the results were tested for robustness and analyzed for heterogeneity. The results showed that the reform of the “three rights separation” of homestead had a positive effect on promoting rural revitalization, but due to the difference in regional economic level and the lag in policy implementation, the promotion effect in some areas was not significant.

Key words: homestead reform, rural revitalization, “three rights separation”, differences-in-differences

中图分类号: