湖北农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 227-232.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.05.039

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

淮海经济区核心区新型城镇化质量评价域差异分析

刘欣然, 奚砚涛   

  1. 中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-04 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 奚砚涛(1973-),男,江苏丰县人,副教授,博士,主要从事地图学与地理信息系统研究,(电话)1891200840(电子信箱)xyt556@cumt.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:刘欣然(1997-),女,江苏睢宁人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为地图学与地理信息系统,(电话)19851627750(电子信箱)lxr97116@163.com。

Quality evaluation and regional difference analysis of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone

LIU Xin-ran, XI Yan-tao   

  1. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-01-04 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-06-12

摘要: 根据淮海经济区核心区新型城镇化发展特点与实际情况,从城市化发展、城乡统筹、资源环境3个层面,建立新型城镇化质量的综合评价指标体系,运用熵值法、差异系数及GIS空间分析方法,揭示2010—2018年淮海经济区核心区新型城镇化质量水平时空演变过程。结果表明,淮海经济区核心区新型城镇化质量整体呈上升趋势,区域内部质量差异较为明显。徐州市的城镇化质量水平始终保持领先地位,属于优质-中速发展模式;济宁市、枣庄市、连云港市、宿迁市的城镇化质量水平中等,发展模式分别为中质-低速、中质-中速、中质-中速、中质-低速;商丘市、淮北市、宿州市城镇化质量水平相对较低,发展模式分别为低质-低速、低质-高速、低质-低速。

关键词: 新型城镇化, 淮海经济区核心区, 熵值法, 区域时空差异

Abstract: According to the development characteristics and actual situation of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone, the comprehensive evaluation index system for the quality of new urbanization was established from three aspects of urbanization development, urban-rural overall planning, and resources and environment. The entropy method, difference coefficient and GIS spatial analysis method were used to reveal the temporal and spatial evolution process of new urbanization quality level in the core area of Huaihai economic zone from 2010 to 2018. The results showed that the quality of new urbanization in the core area of Huaihai economic zone was on the rise as a whole, and the quality difference within the region was obvious. The urbanization quality level of Xuzhou City had always maintained a leading position and belonged to the high quality with medium speed development mode; Jining City, Zaozhuang City, Lianyungang City and Suqian City had medium quality level of urbanization, and the development modes were medium quality with low speed, medium quality with medium speed, medium quality with medium speed and medium quality with low speed, respectively; Shangqiu City, Huaibei City and Suzhou City had relatively low urbanization quality level, and their development modes were low quality with low speed, low quality with high speed and low quality with low speed, respectively.

Key words: new urbanization, core area of Huaihai economic zone, entropy method, regional temporal and spatial differences

中图分类号: