斥水红黏土最优含水率下的抗剪强度研究

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.24.032

湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (24): 149-152.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.24.032

斥水红黏土最优含水率下的抗剪强度研究

王春华, 傅蜀燕, 胡孟凡, 张才溢, 欧斌

云南农业大学水利学院,昆明 650201

收稿日期:2022-05-26 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2023-01-18
通讯作者: 欧斌（1983-）,男,博士,讲师,主要从事水工结构安全监测诊断研究,（电子信箱）oubin418@126.com。
作者简介:王春华（1998-）,女,山东临朐人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为非饱和土基本性质,（电话）17806189105（电子信箱）3130016369@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（52069029）

Study on shear strength of water repellent red clay under optimal water content

WANG Chun-hua, FU Shu-yan, HU Meng-fan, ZHANG Cai-yi, OU Bin

College of Water Conservancy, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

Received:2022-05-26 Online:2022-12-25 Published:2023-01-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在相同湿度环境下放置相同时间斥水土含水率明显小于亲水土,故经测定后试样选用最优含水率为初始含水率进行斥水红黏土抗剪强度试验。利用十八烷基伯胺[CH₃（CH₂）₁₆CH₂NH₂,简称十八胺]作为斥水剂,采用不同垂直压力、含水率作为变量进行直剪试验,对斥水土、亲水土、斥水土+30%斥水砂3种土进行对比。结果表明,斥水土的斥水度、强度与土壤含水率有密切关系,且在最优含水率下斥水土强度明显大于亲水土,但在相同含水率下亲水土强度大于斥水土,此时斥水土延性降低,在斥水土中加入斥水砂其延性得到提高。斥水土中水分难以进入,基质吸力下降不明显,最优含水率下斥水土黏聚力c较大。

关键词: 抗剪强度, 十八胺, 垂直压力, 含水率, 直剪试验, 斥水土

Abstract: Under the same humidity environment, the moisture content of water repellent soil was obviously less than that of natural soil at the same time. Therefore, after measurement, the sample selects the optimal moisture content as the initial moisture content for the shear strength test of water repellent red clay. Octadecyl primary amine [CH₃（CH₂）₁₆CH₂NH₂, referred to as Octadecyl Amine] was used as water repellent, and different vertical pressure and water content were used as variables to carry out the direct shear test. Three kinds of soil, repellent, natural, repellent and 30% repellent sand, were compared. The results showed that the water repellency of water repellent soil was closely related to the soil moisture content, and the water repellent intensity was significantly higher than that of under the optimal moisture content, but the water repellent intensity of natural soil was higher than that of water repellent soil under the same moisture content. At this time, the ductility of water repellent soil was reduced, and the ductility was improved by adding water repellent sand to water repellent soil. The strength and water repellency of soil were related to water content. It was difficult for water to enter the water repellent soil, and the decrease of matrix suction was not obvious, so the cohesion c of water repellent soil was large under the optimal water content.

Key words: shear strength, octadecyl amine, vertical pressure, moisture content, direct shear test, repellent soil

中图分类号:

TU43

王春华, 傅蜀燕, 胡孟凡, 张才溢, 欧斌. 斥水红黏土最优含水率下的抗剪强度研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(24): 149-152.

WANG Chun-hua, FU Shu-yan, HU Meng-fan, ZHANG Cai-yi, OU Bin. Study on shear strength of water repellent red clay under optimal water content[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(24): 149-152.

参考文献

[1] 杨邦杰. 土壤斥水性引起的土地退化、调查方法与改良措施研究[J].环境科学,1994, 15(4): 88-90.
[2] LOZANO E, JIMÉNEZ-PINILLA P, MATAIX-SOLERA J, et al. Biological and chemical factors controlling the patchy distribution of soil water repellency among plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest[J]. Geoderma,2013, 207-208: 212-220.
[3] DOERR S H, SHAKESBY R A, WALSH R P D. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance[J]. Earth-Science reviews,2000, 51: 33-65.
[4] BAUTERS T W J, DICARLO D A, STEENHUIS T S, et al. Preferential flow in water-repellent sands[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J,1998, 62(5): 1185-1190.
[5] JONGE L W, JACOBSEN O H, MOLDRUP P.Soil water repellency: Effects of water content,temperature,and particle size[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J,1999, 63(3): 437-442.
[6] SCHREINER O,SHOREY E C.Chemical nature of soil organic matter[J]. Dept Agr Bur Soils Bull, 1910, 74: 2-48.
[7] 唐德秀,李毅,刘俸,等. 土壤斥水性对不同植物种子发芽率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2018, 37(8): 83-90.
[8] 李毅,商艳玲,李振华,等. 土壤斥水性研究进展[J].农业机械学报, 2012, 43(1): 68-75.
[9] DOERR S H, FERREIRA A J D, WALSH R P D, et al. Soil water repellency as a potential parameter in rainfall-runoff modeling: Experimental evidence at point to catchment scales from Portugal[J]. Hydrol process,2003, 17(2): 363-377.
[10] KONG D, WAN R, CHEN J, et al.The study on engineering characteristics and compression mechanisms of typical historical earthen site soil[J]. Construction and building materials, 2009, 213(20): 386-403.
[11] 穆璇,吴玉琴. 增湿对斥水土壤压实性的影响研究[J].水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(10): 199-208.
[12] DOERRS H, RITSEMA C J.Water movement in hydrophobic soils[J]. Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences,2005(2):1027-1040.
[13] LEE W, JIN M K, YOO W C, et al.Nanostructuring of a polymeric substrate with well-defined nanometer scale topography and tailored surface wettability[J]. Langmuir,2004, 20(18): 7665-7669.
[14] 王景明,王珂,郑咏梅,等. 荷叶表面纳米结构与浸润性的关系[J].高等学校化学学报,2010, 31(8): 1596-1599.
[15] 徐先锋,刘烁,洪龙龙. 非金属超疏水材料的制备方法及研究进展[J].中国塑料,2013, 27(5): 12-18.
[16] 刘清秉,项伟,张伟锋,等. 离子土壤固化剂改性膨胀土的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2009, 30(8): 2286-2290.
[17] 吴珺华,林辉,周晓宇,等. 斥水剂作用下非饱和土壤抗剪强度测定及其变化规律[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6): 123-129.
[18] 杨松,王磊,周明凯,等. 干湿循环对土壤斥水性的影响[J].土壤, 2019, 51(6): 1196-1201.
[19] 吴珺华,刘嘉铭,王茂胜,等. 斥水土壤斥水度变化规律及影响因素试验研究[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2021,52(1):185-190.
[20] 周芳琴,罗鸿禧. 微生物对某些岩土工程性质的影响[J].岩土力学, 1997, 18(2): 17-22.
[21] ROPER M M.The isolation and characterisation of bacteria with the potential to degrade waxes that cause water repellency in sandy soils[J]. Australian journal of soil, 2004, 42(4): 427-434.
[22] FREDLUND D G, MORGENSTERN N R, WIDGER R A.The shear strength of unsaturated soils[J]. Canadian geotechnical, 1978, 15: 313-321.
[23] FREDLUND D G,RAHARDJO H.非饱和土土力学[M].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1997.
[24] 李云龙,郭春颖,徐敏. 非饱和带水分特征曲线经验公式研究[J].中国矿业, 2010, 19(8): 105-109.
[25] ESCARIO V,SAEZ J.The shear strength of partly saturated soils[J]. Geotechnique,2015, 36(3): 453-456.
[26] 吴珺华,杨松. 干湿循环下膨胀土基质吸力测定及其对抗剪强度影响试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2017, 38(3): 678-684.
[27] 许朝阳,张莉,周健. 微生物改性对粉土某些特性的影响[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2009, 31(2): 80-84.
[28] 杨松,吴玉琴,周明凯. 斥水红黏土的增湿强度特性研究[J].土壤,2021, 53(1): 183-189.
[29] LEELAMANIE D A L,KARUBE J,YOSHIDA A. Clay effects on the contact angle and water drop penetration time of model soils[J]. Soil science and plant nutrition, 2010, 56(3): 371-375.
[30] 吴珺华,林辉,刘嘉铭,等. 十八胺化学改性下壤土的斥水性与入渗性能研究[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(13): 122-128.

斥水红黏土最优含水率下的抗剪强度研究

Study on shear strength of water repellent red clay under optimal water content

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田思思, 王婷芳, 唐晓丹, 张乐倩. 氮磷添加对菜地土壤肥力的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(11): 72-75.
[2]	彭云露, 胡远艳, 李惠玲, 胡艳, 田建平. 常用黎族药物裸花紫珠种子生物学特性及萌发性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(10): 90-92.
[3]	李东阳. 引黄灌区不同灌溉强度和灌溉方式对土壤水分和成分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(17): 27-30.
[4]	刘银秀, 陈宁, 刘莹, 匡晓为. 湖北省自动土壤水分站容积含水率订正系数阈值探讨[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(14): 29-36.
[5]	杨彩勤, 徐玉霞, 陈炜, 马凯, 何文鑫, 杨锋. 海绵校园建设中不同绿地类型雨水蓄滞能力研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(6): 51-54.
[6]	刘博, 李洪涛, 徐风仓, 刘怀波. 烟草在制品解吸湿特性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(23): 105-108.