控释掺混肥对双季玉米氨挥发和肥料养分回收率的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.21.011

湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (21): 62-66.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.21.011

控释掺混肥对双季玉米氨挥发和肥料养分回收率的影响

徐祥玉¹, 周剑雄¹, 喻大昭¹, 向礼波¹, 袁家富¹, 郑磊², 张强²

1.湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所,武汉 430064;
2.金正大生态工程集团股份有限公司,山东临沂 276700

收稿日期:2022-05-17 出版日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2022-12-10
通讯作者: 袁家富（1963-）,男,湖北松滋人,研究员,主要从事土壤改良研究,（电子信箱）505894325@qq.com。
作者简介:徐祥玉（1979-）,男,甘肃秦安人,副研究员,博士,主要从事双季玉米施肥及环境过程等研究,（电话）15172394579（电子信箱）xuxiangyu2004@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFD0200703）; 湖北省农业科技创新专项（2016-620-000-001-020）; 山东省重点研发计划项目（2019TSCYCX-33）

Effects of controlled-release mixed fertilizer on ammonia volatilization and fertilizer nutrient recovery rate of double maize cropping system

XU Xiang-yu¹, ZHOU Jian-xiong¹, YU Da-zhao¹, XIANG Li-bo¹, YUAN Jia-fu¹, ZHENG Lei², ZHANG Qiang²

1. Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer,Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Wuhan 430064,China;
2. Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Linyi 276700, Shandong, China

Received:2022-05-17 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了减少氨挥发、提高养分利用效率,以春季子粒玉米-秋季青贮玉米为种植体系,以不施肥为对照,通过设置常规施肥（单质肥和复合肥）和控释掺混肥（比常规施肥氮用量减少20%,控释尿素分别占50%、70%和100%）研究控释肥适宜掺混比例及对氨挥发和养分利用效率的影响。结果表明,所有施肥处理的玉米产量显著高于不施肥对照;在施肥模式下,常规施肥（CG1、CG2）之间、控释掺混肥（CF1、CF2、CF3）之间以及常规施肥与控释掺混肥之间玉米产量均无显著差异。春子粒玉米季氨挥发主要发生在施肥后30 d内、秋青贮玉米季则主要发生在施肥后15 d内,秋青贮玉米季氨挥发高峰显著高于春子粒玉米季;常规施肥模式下复合肥处理氨挥发量低于单质肥处理,控释掺混肥模式下3个处理之间无明显差异,以100%控释肥（CF3）处理氨挥发最低。春子粒玉米氮素回收率从高到低依次为CF1、CF3、CF2、CG2、CG1。综合考虑产量、氨挥发、氮素回收率以及成本,在江汉平原春季子粒玉米+秋季青贮玉米模式下以N、P₂O₅、K₂O施用量分别为168、105、150 kg/hm²,控释尿素占比50%效果最好。

关键词: 子粒玉米, 青贮玉米, 控释掺混肥, 氨挥发

Abstract: In order to reduce ammonia volatilization and improve nutrient utilization efficiency, the experiment was conducted to study the effects of controlled-release mixed fertilizer on ammonia volatilization and nutrient utilization efficiency by setting conventional fertilization treatments （simple matter fertilizer and compound fertilizer） and controlled-release mixed fertilizer treatments （20% less nitrogen than conventional fertilization, 50%, 70% and 100% controlled-release urea）, with “grain maize in spring-silage corn in autumn” as planting system and no fertilization as control. The results showed that the yield of grain maize and silage corn under all fertilization treatments was significantly higher than that of the control treatment, and there were no significant differences in the yield of grain maize and silage corn among different fertilization treatments. Ammonia volatilization occured mainly within 30 days after fertilization in grain maize season and within 15 days after fertilization in silage corn season. The peak of ammonia volatilization in silage corn season was significantly higher than that of grain maize season. The ammonia volatilization of compound fertilizer was lower than that of simple fertilizer; there was no obvious difference among different treatments of the controlled-release mixed fertilizer, and the ammonia volatilization was lowest in CF3 treatment. The nitrogen recovery rates of grain maize from high to low were CF1, CF3, CF2, CG2 and CG1. Considering the yield, ammonia volatilization, nitrogen recovery rate and cost, the suitable fertilization ratio was N, P₂O₅, K₂O of 168,105,150 kg/hm², and controlled-release urea accounting for 50% in the “grain maize in spring-silage corn in autumn” system in Jianghan Plain.

Key words: grain maize, silage corn, controlled release mixed fertilizer, ammonia volatilization

中图分类号:

S513
S14-33

徐祥玉, 周剑雄, 喻大昭, 向礼波, 袁家富, 郑磊, 张强. 控释掺混肥对双季玉米氨挥发和肥料养分回收率的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(21): 62-66.

XU Xiang-yu, ZHOU Jian-xiong, YU Da-zhao, XIANG Li-bo, YUAN Jia-fu, ZHENG Lei, ZHANG Qiang. Effects of controlled-release mixed fertilizer on ammonia volatilization and fertilizer nutrient recovery rate of double maize cropping system[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 61(21): 62-66.

参考文献

[1] 彭少兵,黄见良,钟旭华,等. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002,35(9): 1095-1103.
[2] 于飞, 施卫明. 近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6): 1311-1324.
[3] 朱兆良. 农田中氮肥的损失与对策[J]. 土壤与环境,2000,9(1): 1-6.
[4] PAN B B, LAM S K, MOSIER A, et al.Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: A global synthesis[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment,2016,232:283-289.
[5] MA R Y, ZOU J W, HAN Z Q, et al.Global soil-derived ammonia emissions from agricultural nitrogen fertilizer application: A refinement based on regional and crop-specific emission factors[J]. Global change biology, 2021,27(4):855-867.
[6] 朱影,庄国强,吴尚华,等. 农田土壤氨挥发的过程和控制技术研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2020, 46(6): 88-96.
[7] 王艳,段学军. 氨污染:被忽视的雾霾元凶[J]. 生态经济, 2017,33(6):6-9.
[8] BAYRAKLI F.Ammonia volatilization losses from different fertilizers and effect of several urease inhibitors, CaCl₂ and phosphogypsum on losses from urea[J]. Fertilizer research, 1990, 23(3): 147-150.
[9] CAI G X,CHEN D L,DING H,et al.Nitrogen losses from fertilizers applied to maize,wheat and rice in the North China Plain[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2002, 63(2):187-195.
[10] RAO D L N, BATRA L. Ammonia volatilization from applied nitrogen in alkali soils[J]. Plant and soil, 1983, 70: 219-228.
[11] HE Y P,YANG S H,XU J Z,et al.Ammonia volatilization losses from paddy fields under controlled irrigation with different drainage treatments[J]. The scientific world journal,2015,1(2):83-88.
[12] ZAMAN M, SAGGAR S, STAFFORD A D.Mitigation of ammonia losses from urea applied to a pastoral system: The effect of NBTPT and timing and amount of irrigation[J]. Proceedings of the new zealand grassland association, 2013,75:209-214.
[13] CHIEN S H, PROCHNOW L I, CANTARELLA H.Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts[J]. Advances in agronomy, 2009, 102(9): 267-322.
[14] SAGGAR S, SINGH J, GILTRAP D L, et al.Quantification of reductions in ammonia emissions from fertiliser urea and animal urine in grazed pastures with urease inhibitors for agriculture inventory: New Zealand as a case study[J]. Science of the total environment, 2013,465: 136-146.
[15] CHEN D D, SUTER H H, ISLAM A A, et al.Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: A review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers[J]. Australian journal of soil research, 2008, 46: 289-301.
[16] HAWKE B G, BALDOCK J A.Ammonia volatilisation from urea fertiliserproducts applied to an alkaline soil[A]. GILKES R J, PRAKONGKEP N. Proceedings of the 19th world congress of soil science: Soil solutions for a changing world[C]. 2010: 12-15.
[17] 安文博,孙焱鑫,李占台,等. 不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2422-2430.
[18] 秦道珠,李冬初,徐明岗,等. 红壤稻田施用控释肥与氮素转化的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008,24(9): 273-276.
[19] 侯朋福,薛利祥,俞映倞,等. 缓控释肥侧深施对稻田氨挥发排放的控制效果[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(12): 5326-5332.
[20] 刘伯顺,黄立华,黄金鑫,等. 我国农田氨挥发研究进展与减排对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(6): 875-888.
[21] 卢丽丽, 吴根义. 农田氨排放影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2019,24(1):149-162.
[22] 李淑娅, 田少阳, 袁国印,等. 长江中游不同玉稻种植模式产量及资源利用效率的比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(10): 1537-1547.
[23] 袁建华,颜伟,陈艳萍,等. 南方丘陵生态区玉米生产现状及发展对策[J]. 玉米科学, 2003,11(S2): 29-31.
[24] 王朝辉,刘学军,巨晓棠,等. 田间土壤氨挥发的原位测定——通气法[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002(2): 205-209.
[25] 宋梓璇,李虎,李建政,等. 控释肥对东北春玉米产量和土壤氨挥发的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(10):2342-2349.
[26] 张英鹏,李洪杰,刘兆辉,等. 农田减氮调控施肥对华北潮土区小麦-玉米轮作体系氮素损失的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187.
[27] 李洪杰,赵同凯,孙明,等. 不同氮肥运筹对潮土区冬小麦产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(11): 51-55.
[28] 李伟. 控释掺混肥在小麦-玉米轮作体系中的应用效果研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2012.
[29] 徐辰峰. 不同类型缓控释肥对水稻南粳9108氮素利用的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(3): 156-159.
[30] 王文岩,董文旭,陈素英,等. 连续施用控释肥对小麦/玉米农田氮素平衡与利用率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S2): 135-141.
[31] 兰唱,石卓,王少杰,等. 氮肥调控对东北黑土春玉米氮利用及氨挥发的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(6): 118-126.
[32] 赵斌,董树亭,王空军,等. 控释肥对夏玉米产量及田间氨挥发和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(11): 2678-2684.
[33] 俞映倞,薛利红,杨林章. 太湖地区稻田不同氮肥管理模式下氨挥发特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(8): 1682-1689.
[34] 田昌,周旋,谢桂先,等. 控释尿素减施对双季稻田氨挥发损失和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(4): 387-397.
[35] 李然,蔡威威,艾天成,等. 稻田氨挥发损失和水稻产量对不同水氮处理的响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3): 47-54.

控释掺混肥对双季玉米氨挥发和肥料养分回收率的影响

Effects of controlled-release mixed fertilizer on ammonia volatilization and fertilizer nutrient recovery rate of double maize cropping system

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程子珍, 范先鹏, 余延丰, 吴茂前, 熊桂云, 张富林, 刘冬碧, 夏颖, 张志毅. 秸秆还田环境效应研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(23): 5-7.
[2]	李红梅, 蒋相国, 郭凯, 胡竹鹃. 花生控释掺混肥减量使用效果[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(21): 56-58.
[3]	冯鹏, 胡飞, 李新彦, 马现斌, 郭莉, 李有明. 襄阳市青贮玉米现状与发展对策[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(9): 127-129.
[4]	郭莉, 马现斌, 胡飞, 李新彦, 王喜照, 李有明. 夏播粮饲通用型青贮玉米品种农艺性状与生物学产量的相关性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(22): 24-27.
[5]	焦金龙, 张艳茹, 王伟, 赵丽, 吴元奇. 西南地区20个青贮玉米品种(系)比较试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(20): 134-137.
[6]	王宏博, 李维红, 杨晓玲, 高雅琴, 席斌. 青贮甜高粱替代青贮玉米对羔羊生产性能和养分消化代谢的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(16): 112-114.
[7]	曾德斌, 王军民, 吴向阳, 韩秀秀, 龙永红, 李旭春, 张英, 潘典进. 青贮玉米不同品种和生育时期植株体的营养品质分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(5): 85-87.
[8]	蔡正军, 常海滨, 赵俊立. 10个青贮玉米品种在黄冈地区的表现分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(21): 134-136.
[9]	付忠军, 赵丽, 李淑君, 杨华, 吴元奇, 祁志云. 青贮玉米品种筛选试验初报[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(12): 119-123.
[10]	赵俊立, 常海滨, 李宁. 黄冈市青贮玉米新品种比较试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(24): 60-61.