湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 181-186.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.07.034

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

工商资本下乡的演化历程及其影响效应

汪婷, 费罗成   

  1. 安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,安徽 芜湖 241002
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-25 出版日期:2022-04-10 发布日期:2022-05-04
  • 通讯作者: 费罗成(1985-),男,安徽当涂人,副教授,博士,主要从事农村土地管理方向研究,(电子信箱)flcbbm@126.com。
  • 作者简介:汪婷(1996-),女,安徽宣州人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为农村土地利用,(电话)15955318930(电子信箱)1728543402@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKQ2020D19)

The evolution process and influence effect of industrial and commercial capital to the countryside

WANG Ting, FEI Luo-cheng   

  1. School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, Anhui, China
  • Received:2021-09-25 Online:2022-04-10 Published:2022-05-04

摘要: 从城乡统筹发展视角出发,通过梳理中国工商资本下乡的政策演化及发展现状,结合文献研究,揭示中国工商资本下乡产生的多元主体效应。研究表明,工商资本下乡的政策演化经历了限制、放宽、引导与规范3个阶段,现已形成多主体、多模式的基本特征;工商资本下乡会对农户、基层政府、村集体、工商资本等主体产生多元效应,同时会显露出资本下乡的“双刃剑”属性;具体来说,可增加农户收入、提高农户组织化程度,也会损害农户利益、制约农户自身长效发展;可激活退化的村集体组织机构功能,也对基层治理带来了一定冲击;可提升基层官员政策执行绩效,也易造成职能缺位引发执政风险;有益于企业发展,同时也使企业面临经营风险。在资本下乡的背景下,应针对不同主体特点采取不同的优化路径来规范和引导,以实现多元主体共享收益、合作共赢。

关键词: 资本下乡, 演化历程, 多元主体, 影响效应, 优化路径

Abstract: From the perspective of overall urban and rural development,by combing the policy evolution and development status of China's industrial and commercial capital to the countryside, combined with literature research, the multi subject effect of China's industrial and commercial capital to the countryside was revealed. The results show that the policy evolution of the industrial and commercial capital to the countryside has experienced three stages of restriction, relaxation, guidance and regulation,and has formed the basic characteristics of multiple subjects and multiple models. This phenomenon has a diversified effect on farmers, grassroots governments, village collectives, and business capital itself, which demonstrates the attribute of a “double-edged sword”. Specifically, capital to the countryside can increase the income of farmers, improve the degree of organization of farmers, and yet it harms the farmers' interests and restricts the long-term development of farmers themselves. This can also activate the functions of degraded village collective organizations, but bring a certain impact to grassroots governance. For grassroots governments, this can enhance their performance, but also lead to ruling risks on account of the absence of functions. It is beneficial to the development of enterprise, but also makes enterprise face operating risks at the same time. Under the background of capital to the countryside, different optimization paths should be adopted according to the characteristics of different subjects, so as to realize the sharing benefits and win-win cooperation among multiple subjects.

Key words: capital to the countryside, evolution process, multiple subjects, influence effect, optimal path

中图分类号: