湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 193-195.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.04.038

• 经济·管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态农产品定价策略研究

蒋凡1,2, 王永富1   

  1. 1.广西生态工程职业技术学院,广西 柳州 545004;
    2.北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-01 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 王永富(1968-),男,四川荣县人,教授,主要从事林产品物流研究,(电话)13633066752(电子信箱)409151056@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:蒋 凡(1984-),男,湖北钟祥人,工程师,博士,主要从事生态产品研究,(电话)14796209893(电子信箱)jf16896@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    广西哲学社会科学规划研究课题(15BJY013); 2021年度广西社科界智库重点课题(Zkzdkt-70); 2021年度广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目(2021KY1202)

Study on pricing strategies of ecological agricultural products

JIANG Fan1,2, WANG Yong-fu2   

  1. 1. Guangxi Eco-engineering Vocational and Technical College,Liuzhou 545004, Guangxi,China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2021-03-01 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-18

摘要: 分析了生态农产品消费群体的定位和生态农产品定价策略的可行性,认为生态农产品采用撇脂定价策略相对于渗透定价策略和成本加成定价策略显示出更大的优越性。还提出努力提升生态农产品品质、高效传递生态农产品质量信息、积极维护生态农产品品牌形象等完善生态农产品撇脂定价策略的建议。

关键词: 生态农产品, 定价策略, 撇脂定价

Abstract: The consumer positioning of eco-agricultural products and the feasibility of eco-agricultural products pricing strategies were analyzed, it was held that the application of skimming pricing strategy for eco-agriculture products would have greater superiority over penetration pricing strategy and cost-plus pricing strategy. Some suggestions had also been put forward to improve skimming pricing strategy for ecological agricultural products by improving the quality of ecological agricultural products, efficiently transmitting information about the quality of ecological agricultural products, and actively maintaining the brand image of ecological agricultural products.

Key words: ecological agricultural products, pricing strategies, skimming pricing

中图分类号: