湖北农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 133-135.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2022.04.026

• 畜牧·兽医 • 上一篇    下一篇

大林姬鼠和棕背䶄生物学指标对比分析

苏航, 周思宇, 杨文建, 徐春雨, 万祥旭, 金志民   

  1. 牡丹江师范学院,黑龙江 牡丹江 157011
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-13 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 金志民(1972-),男,黑龙江庆安人,教授,博士,研究方向为动物生态学,(电子信箱)swxjzm@126.com。
  • 作者简介:苏 航(1998-),女,黑龙江绥化人,硕士,研究方向为动物学,(电话)15765241657(电子信箱)15765241657@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(LH2020C071; SS2021C006); 牡丹江师范学院项目(2021H03)

Comparative analysis on biological index of Apodemus peninsulae and Clethrionomys rufocanus

SU Hang, ZHOU Si-yu, YANG Wen-jian, XU Chun-yu, WAN Xiang-xu, JIN Zhi-min   

  1. Mudanjiang Normal University,Mudanjiang 157011,Heilongjiang,China
  • Received:2021-05-13 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-18

摘要: 为了解大林姬鼠(Apodemus peninsulae)和棕背䶄(Clethrionomys rufocanus)生物学指标上的差异,对两种鼠进行解剖,并对相关指标进行测量和比较分析。结果表明,雄性大林姬鼠和雄性棕背䶄在体长、前足长、尾长上均差异极显著(P<0.01),耳长差异显著(P<0.05),后足长差异不显著;雌性大林姬鼠和雌性棕背䶄在体长、耳长、足长、尾长上均差异极显著(P<0.01);大林姬鼠和棕背䶄的体重、胴体重、心脏重、肺脏重、胃重均差异极显著(P<0.01),脾脏重、肾脏重差异不显著。雄性大林姬鼠和雄性棕背䶄的肝脏重差异显著(P<0.05)。雌性大林姬鼠和雌性棕背䶄的肝脏重差异不显著。

关键词: 大林姬鼠(Apodemus peninsulae), 棕背䶄(Clethrionomys rufocanus), 脏器对比, 长度测量

Abstract: In order to understand the differences in biological indicators of Apodemus peninsulae and Clethrionomys rufocanus, two species of mice were dissected, and the related indicators were measured,compared and analyzed. The results showed that there were extremely significant differences in body length, forefoot length and tail length between Apodemus peninsulae and Clethrionomys rufocanusP<0.01), significant differences in ear length (P<0.05) and no significant differences in hind foot length. The differences of body length, ear length, foot length and tail length of female Apodemus peninsulae and female Clethrionomys rufocanus were extremely significant (P<0.01). The differences in body weight, carcass weight, heart weight, lung weight, and stomach weight of Apodemus peninsulae and Clethrionomys rufocanus are extremely significant (P<0.01), while the differences in spleen weight and kidney weight are not significant. There were significant differences in liver weights between male Apodemus peninsulae and male Clethrionomys rufocanusP<0.05). There was no significant difference in liver weights between female Apodemus peninsulae and female Clethrionomys rufocanus.

Key words: Apodemus peninsulae, Clethrionomys rufocanus, organ comparison, length measurement

中图分类号: