不同种植模式对佛手山药土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.23.017

湖北农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (23): 79-84.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.23.017

不同种植模式对佛手山药土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

刘东海¹, 乔艳¹, 李双来¹, 张智¹, 李菲¹, 徐为², 胡诚¹

1.湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所,武汉 430064;
2.湖北美天生物科技股份有限公司,湖北武穴 435400

收稿日期:2021-09-16 出版日期:2021-12-10 发布日期:2021-12-21
通讯作者: 胡诚,（电子信箱）huchenghxz@163.com。
作者简介:刘东海（1984-）,男,河北邯郸人,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事土壤肥力演变研究工作,（电话）027-88430575（电子信箱）396520042@qq.com;

Effects of different planting patterns on soil nutrients and microbial community of Foshou yam

LIU Dong-hai¹, QIAO Yan¹, LI Shuang-lai¹, ZHANG Zhi¹, LI Fei¹, XU Wei², HU Cheng¹

1 Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer,Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Wuhan 430064,China;
2. Hubei Masteam Bio-tech Co.Ltd.,Wuxue 435400,Hubei,China

Received:2021-09-16 Online:2021-12-10 Published:2021-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采集轮作和连作3年的佛手山药土壤,采用高通量测序技术,研究2种模式下土壤细菌、真菌和线虫群落多样性和群落组成特征,以及土壤理化性质和山药产量变化情况。结果表明,连作富集了土壤速效养分,降低了佛手山药的产量以及土壤细菌、真菌和线虫群落的多样性。土壤细菌、真菌和线虫群落组成结构发生较大变化。连作显著提高绿弯菌门丰度,使其成为主要的优势类群,同时降低了变形菌门、厚壁菌门、芽单胞菌门和拟杆菌门丰度。2种模式下真菌优势种群都是子囊菌门和担子菌门。连作降低了子囊菌门,提高了担子菌门和毛霉菌门。连作显著提高土壤线虫类群的丰度。与山药连作比较,轮作改善土壤微生物群落结构,稳定了山药产量,是武穴山药种植区较好的种植模式。

关键词: 佛手山药, 种植模式, 土壤养分, 微生物多样性

Abstract: The soil of Foshan yam under rotation and continuous cropping for 3 years was collected, and the high-throughput sequencing technique was used to study the community diversity and composition characteristics of soil bacteria, fungi and nematodes, as well as the changes of soil physical and chemical properties and yam yield. The results showed that continuous cropping enriched soil available nutrients, decreased the yield of bergamot yam and the diversity of soil bacteria, fungi and nematodes. The community structure of soil bacteria, fungi and nematodes changed greatly. Continuous cropping significantly increased the abundance of Campylobacter, making it the main dominant group, while reducing the abundance of Proteobacteri a, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes and Bacteroidetes. Under the two models, the dominant populations of fungi were Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Continuous cropping reduced Ascomycota and increased Basidiomycota and Mucor. Continuous cropping significantly increased the abundance of soil nematodes. Therefore, compared with continuous cropping of yam, rotation could improve the structure of soil microbial community and stabilize the yield of yam, which was a better planting pattern in Wuxue yam planting area.

Key words: Foshou yam, planting pattern, soil nutrient, microbial diversity

中图分类号:

刘东海, 乔艳, 李双来, 张智, 李菲, 徐为, 胡诚. 不同种植模式对佛手山药土壤养分和微生物群落的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(23): 79-84.

LIU Dong-hai, QIAO Yan, LI Shuang-lai, ZHANG Zhi, LI Fei, XU Wei, HU Cheng. Effects of different planting patterns on soil nutrients and microbial community of Foshou yam[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 60(23): 79-84.

参考文献 29

[1]	程水源, 鲍宏礼.鄂东特色农产品及其产业化研究[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2008.
[2]	刘隽雅. 湖北省县域农业特色产业发展研究——以武穴市佛手山药为例[J].农家参谋,2020(3):32.
[3]	马莹. 温县怀山药种植区土壤理化特征及根际土壤微生态环境特征分析[D].河南焦作:河南理工大学,2011.
[4]	张红霞,张舒雅,张玉涛,等.山药根际土壤微生物16S rRNA多样性及影响因素[J].土壤学报,2019,56(5):1235-1246.
[5]	孙凯宁,杨宁,王克安,等.山药连作对土壤微生物群落及土壤酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):95-98.
[6]	王道文.山药(Dioscorea opposita)根结线虫病[J].河南农业大学学报,1985(4):436-437.
[7]	王文庆. 平遥长山药连作障碍机理研究及其防治对策[D].太原:山西大学,2011.
[8]	MA F,WANG R,ZHU J,et al.Characterisation comparison of polysaccharides from Dioscorea opposita Thunb. growing in sandy soil, loessial soil and continuous cropping[J]. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2019, 126: 776-785.
[9]	宋佳承. 轮作及连作对马铃薯生长发育及根际微环境的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020.
[10]	苏燕,李婕,曹雪颖,等.水旱轮作模式下马铃薯根际土壤细菌群落多样性分析[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(10):2374-2382.
[11]	范琳娟,刘子荣,徐雪亮,等.山药不同种植模式对土壤线虫群落结构和土壤理化性质的影响[J] 浙江农业学报,2021,33(2):316-325.
[12]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[13]	PORAZINSKA D L,GIBLIN-DAVIS R M,FALLER L,et al. Evaluating high-throughput sequencing as a method for metagenomic analysis of nematode diversity[J]. Molecular ecology resources, 2009, 9(6):1439-1450.
[14]	于艳梅,柴泽宇,孙本华,等.我国主要农田土壤磷淋溶阈值及其与土壤性质的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(15):281-287.
[15]	李佳. 长山药的生态配方施肥技术研究[D].太原:山西大学,2012.
[16]	陈虹,杨磊,张凤华.新疆长期棉花连作对土壤理化性状与线虫群落的影响[J/OL].应用生态学报,[2021-08-19]. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.026.
[17]	KONG A Y Y, SIX J, BRYANT D C, et al. The relationship between carbon input, aggregation, and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2005, 69(4): 1078-1085.
[18]	LIU D, ISHIKAWA H, NISHIDA M, et al.Effect of paddy-upland rotation on methanogenic archaeal community structure in paddy field soil[J]. Microbial ecology, 2015, 69(1): 160-168.
[19]	劳承英,韦本辉,周灵芝,等.袋料种植淮山药根际土壤细菌多样性的高通量测序分析[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(10):2367-2373.
[20]	HUG L A, CASTELLE C J, WRIGHTON K C, et al.Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling[J]. Microbiome, 2013, 1(1): 1-17.
[21]	LESAULNIER C, PAPAMICHAIL D, MCCORKLE S, et al.Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen[J]. Environmental microbiology,2008,10(4):926-941.
[22]	CHAUDHRY V,REHMAN A,MISHRA A,et al.Changes in bacterial community structure of agricultural land due to long-term organic and chemical amendments[J]. Microbial ecology,2012, 64(2): 450-460.
[23]	CARLUCCI A, RAIMONDO M L, SANTOS J, et al.Plectosphaerella species associated with root and collar rots of horticultural crops in southern Italy[J]. Persoonia,2012,28: 34-48.
[24]	ZHANG Z Y, CHEN W H, ZOU X, et al.Phylogeny and taxonomy of two new Plectosphaerella (Plectosphaerellaceae,Glomerellales) species from China[J]. MycoKeys, 2019,57: 47-60.
[25]	YANG X Q, MA S Y, PENG Z X, et al.Diversity of Plectosphaerella within aquatic plants from southwest China, with P. endophytica and P. sichuanensis spp. nov[J]. MycoKeys, 2021,80: 57-75.
[26]	戴蓬博,张荣,孙广宇.中国苹果病害病原菌物名录[J].菌物学报,2021,40(4):936-964.
[27]	EKSCHMITT K, BAKONYI G, BONGERS M, et al.Nematode community structure as indicator of soil functioning in European grassland soils[J]. European journal of soil biology,2001,37(4):263-268.
[28]	NEHER D A, WEICHT T R, BARBERCHECK M E.Linking invertebrate communities to decomposition rate and nitrogen availability in pine forest soils[J]. Applied soil ecology,2012,54:14-23.
[29]	MOURA G S, FRANZENER G.Biodiversity of nematodes biological indicators of soil quality in the agroecosystems[J]. Arquivos do instituto biológico, 2017, 84:1-8.

不同种植模式对佛手山药土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

Effects of different planting patterns on soil nutrients and microbial community of Foshou yam

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭轶楠, 祁宏山, 裴延礼, 席鹏, 季彬. 不同植被类型下黑河湿地土壤养分、酶活性、微生物数量的变化特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(9): 44-50.
[2]	赫卫, 张慧, 姜野. 化肥减量配施生物菌肥对辣椒生长和土壤养分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(6): 23-28.
[3]	张璇, 邓秀汕, 邓秀泉, 马大朝, 吴燕萍, 冯庆革. 基于静态好氧工艺的厨余垃圾堆肥特性及微生物多样性[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(5): 59-65.
[4]	刘战勇, 张佳倩, 李娟, 张向前, 厉雅华, 张德健. 大兴安岭南麓农田土壤养分空间异质性分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 25-29.
[5]	丁颖, 刘艳艳. 苏北地区覆膜栽培方式对露地辣椒生长和土壤养分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(10): 115-118.
[6]	刘文婷. 不同绿肥养分特性及其对葡萄园土壤养分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(23): 49-53.
[7]	王会良, 龚林忠, 王富荣, 刘勇, 艾小艳, 吴正利, 袁观强, 聂玉婷, 朱炜, 袁野, 诸小敏, 何华平. 湖北省通山县枇杷园土壤养分状况与分布特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(12): 61-66.
[8]	吴海勇, 唐珍琦, 谷雨, 李明德. 种植年限对稻田土壤pH和养分含量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(11): 67-71.
[9]	孙军伟, 范志勇, 户艳霞, 张建斌, 王斌, 李绍董, 王靓贤, 盘文政. 大理州轮作周期内以烤烟为主的作物种植模式初探[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(1): 106-108.
[10]	王晓荣, 付甜, 唐万鹏, 崔鸿侠, 胡文杰. 不同施肥管理对三峡库区柑橘园土壤养分动态的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(8): 63-69.
[11]	叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 庄恒扬. 农田生态化学计量研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(7): 5-9.
[12]	李宁, 王明辉, 吴鹏, 肖齐圣, 赵俊立, 陶江, 徐华涛, 范周雄. 湖北省大别山区花生耕地土壤研究分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(24): 51-54.
[13]	赵越, 杨良波, 裴佳晨, 刘冬碧, 吴茂前, 唐记平, 郑兴汶, 徐金星, 揭志辉, 赖克强. 江西省广昌县莲田土壤属性和大量元素空间变异特征及评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(22): 47-50.
[14]	陈启亮, 杨晓平, 范净, 牟秉喜, 张靖国, 胡红菊, 陈继富, 田雅琴. 利川市梨园养分投入及土壤养分状况分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(21): 69-72.
[15]	宋发军. 基于GIS和RDA的丘陵区土壤养分空间变异及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(17): 31-35.