常用气象干旱指数SPEI和SPI在陕北地区的适用性研究

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.21.010

湖北农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (21): 42-50.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.21.010

常用气象干旱指数SPEI和SPI在陕北地区的适用性研究

罗漫雅¹, 耿广坡², 周洪奎³, 周雪¹

1.长安大学地球科学与资源学院,西安 710064;
2.西安科技大学测绘科学与技术学院,西安 710054;
3.浙江省农业科学院数字农业研究所,杭州 310021

收稿日期:2020-06-11 出版日期:2020-11-10 发布日期:2020-12-21
作者简介:罗漫雅（1996-）,女,陕西安康人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为景观生态,（电话）15829677192（电子信箱）2018127002@chd.edu.cn;耿广坡,讲师,主要从事生物学方面的研究,（电子信箱）gengguangpo@xust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41807503）; 西安科技大学博士启动金项目（2017QDJ030）

Adaptability research on the common meteorological drought indexes of SPEI and SPI in the northern Shaanxi province

LUO Man-ya¹, GENG Guang-po², ZHOU Hong-kui³, ZHOU Xue¹

1. School of Earth Science and Resources,Changʼan University, Xiʼan 710064, China;
2. College of Geomatics, Xiʼan University of Science and Technology, Xiʼan 710054, China;
3. Institute of Digital Agriculture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2020-06-11 Online:2020-11-10 Published:2020-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于1981—2012年陕北地区10个站点的气象数据,利用标准化降水蒸腾指数（SPEI）和标准化降水指数（SPI）2个常用的气象干旱指数开展干旱时空分布及典型干旱事件识别研究,并利用旱灾历史记录进行验证,评价2种干旱指数在陕北地区的适应性。结果表明,在年尺度上,SPEI较SPI更能准确地描述陕北地区干旱的年际变化,其发现陕北地区近32年来干旱呈加剧态势;在季节尺度上,2种干旱指数的表述基本一致,均发现陕北地区以春旱为主;从空间分布上看,二者均发现陕北东南部是特旱高发区;在28次典型干旱事件的识别中,SPEI识别出19次,SPI识别出6次,SPEI较SPI更为准确。综合来看,SPEI更适用于陕北地区的干旱监测。

关键词: 干旱指数, SPEI, SPI, 适用性, 陕北地区

Abstract: Based on the meteorological data of 10 stations in northern Shaanxi province from 1981 to 2012, the temporal and spatial distribution of drought and the identification of typical drought events were studied by using two commonly used meteorological drought indexes of SPEI and SPI, and the drought historical records were used to verify the adaptability of the two drought indexes in northern Shaanxi province. The results showed that, on the annual scale, SPEI could more accurately describe the interannual variation of drought in northern Shaanxi province than SPI. It was found that the drought in northern Shaanxi province has intensified in the past 32 years. On the seasonal scale, the expressions of the two drought indexes were basically the same, and it was found that spring drought was the main drought in northern Shaanxi province. From the point of view of spatial distribution, both of them found that the southeast of northern Shaanxi province was a region with high incidence of extreme drought. In the identification of 28 typical drought events, 19 events were identified by SPEI and 6 events identified by SPI, and SPEI was more accurate than SPI. To sum up, SPEI is more suitable for drought monitoring in northern Shaanxi province.

Key words: drought index, SPEI, SPI, applicability, northern Shaanxi province

中图分类号:

P463.1

罗漫雅, 耿广坡, 周洪奎, 周雪. 常用气象干旱指数SPEI和SPI在陕北地区的适用性研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(21): 42-50.

LUO Man-ya, GENG Guang-po, ZHOU Hong-kui, ZHOU Xue. Adaptability research on the common meteorological drought indexes of SPEI and SPI in the northern Shaanxi province[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(21): 42-50.

参考文献

[1] 李忆平, 李耀辉. 气象干旱指数在中国的适应性研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(5):709-723.
[2] AMERICAN M S.Meteorological drought:Policy statement[J]. Bulletin of american meteorological society, 1997,78:847-849.
[3] DAI A, TRENBERTH K E, QIAN T.A global data set of palmer drought severity index for 1870—2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming[J]. Journal of hydrometeorology, 2004, 5(6):1117-1130.
[4] 杨庆, 李明星,郑子彦,等.7种气象干旱指数的中国区域适应性[J].中国科学:地球学,2017,47(3):337-353.
[5] 张强,张良,崔显成,等.干旱监测与评价技术的发展及其科学挑战[J].地球科学进展,2011,26(7):763-778.
[6] PALMER W.Meteorological drought[D]. Washington DC: US department of commerce weather bureau, 1965.
[7] WANG L,CHEN W,ZHOU W.Assessment of future drought in southwest China based on CMIP5 multimodel projections[J].Advances in atmospheric sciences,2014,31(5):1035-1050.
[8] VICENTE-SERRANO S M, GOUVEIA C, CAMARERO J J, et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes[J]. PNAS, 2013, 110(1):52-57.
[9] QUIRING S M, PAPAKRYIAKOU T N.An evaluation of agricultural drought indices for the Canadian prairies[J]. Agricultural & forest meteorology, 2003, 118(12):49-62.
[10] VICENTE-SERRANO S M,BEGUERÍA S,LÓPEZMORENO J I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J]. Journal of climate, 2010, 23(7):1696-1718.
[11] 袁文平, 周广胜. 标准化降水指标与Z指数在我国应用的对比分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(4):523-529.
[12] 杨思遥,孟丹,李小娟,等.华北地区2001—2014年植被变化对SPEI气象干旱指数多尺度的响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):1028-1039.
[13] 邹旭恺, 任国玉, 张强. 基于综合气象干旱指数的中国干旱变化趋势研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2010, 15(4):371-378.
[14] 卫捷, 马柱国. Palmer干旱指数、地表湿润指数与降水距平的比较[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(增刊):117-124.
[15] 庄少伟, 左洪超, 任鹏程,等. 标准化降水蒸发指数在中国区域的应用[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2013, 18(5):617-625.
[16] 郭梦,张奇莹,钱会,等.基于SPEI干旱指数的陕西省干旱时空分布特征分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(3):127-132,138.
[17] 苏宏新,李广起.基于SPEI的北京低频干旱与气候指数关系[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(17):5467-5475.
[18] 徐一丹,任传友,马熙达,等.基于SPI/SPEI指数的东北地区多时间尺度干旱变化特征对比分析[J].干旱区研究, 2017, 34(6):1250-1262.
[19] 李思诺,翁白莎,严登明,等.SPI和SPEI在阿克苏河流域的适用性分析[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2016, 27(1):101-107.
[20] THORNTHWAITE C W.An approach toward a rational classification of climate[J]. Geographical review, 1948, 38(1):55-94.
[21] WU H, SVOBODA M D, HAYES M J, et al.Appropriate application of the standardized precipitation index in arid locations and dry seasons[J]. International journal of climatology, 2010, 27(1):65-79.
[22] 贾树年, 付明胜, 王琴,等. 陕北地区1997~2001年持续干旱特征及减灾对策[J]. 中国水土保持, 2002(10):46-47.
[23] 石忆邵. 陕西省干旱灾害的成因及其时空分布特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 1994,8(3):51-57.
[24] 刘引鸽. 陕北黄土高原降水的变化趋势分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2007, 24(1):49-55.
[25] 刘光孟,汪云甲,王允.反距离权重插值因子对插值误差影响分析[J].中国科技论文在线,2010,5(11):879-884.
[26] 温克刚. 中国气象灾害大典陕西卷[M]. 北京:气象出版社, 2005.
[27] 乔丽, 程恺, 吴林荣, 等. 近30a陕西省气象干旱灾害时空分布特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(1):253-256.
[28] 秦大河, 陈振林, 罗勇,等. 气候变化科学的最新认知[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2007, 3(2):63-73.
[29] 李新周, 刘晓东, 马柱国. 近百年来全球主要干旱区的干旱化特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2004, 21(2):97-103.

常用气象干旱指数SPEI和SPI在陕北地区的适用性研究

Adaptability research on the common meteorological drought indexes of SPEI and SPI in the northern Shaanxi province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐作敏, 吴双, 吴英, 宫丽娟, 姜丽霞, 孙涛, 程春香, 谢连妮. 基于FY-3D_TVDI的黑龙江省生长季干旱监测评估[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 241-248.
[2]	张天峰, 姜惠峰, 张可心, 车向军, 张雪姣, 何树洲. 基于逐日SPEI的陇东黄土高原干旱特征分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2023, 62(3): 249-256.
[3]	熊世为, 邱阳阳, 郁凌华, 蒋琳, 华俊玮, 凌遵斌. 基于SPI的安徽省1961—2019年干旱演变特征分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(6): 56-60.