湖北农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 93-98.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.11.020

• 园艺·特产 • 上一篇    下一篇

会东烤烟化学成分和感官质量分析

石刚1, 赵晓超1, 潘昊东2, 张振2, 付龙3, 王豹祥1, 汪健1, 凌爱芬4   

  1. 1. 湖北中烟工业有限责任公司, 武汉 430000;
    2. 河南农业大学烟草学院, 郑州 450002;
    3. 湖北中烟武汉卷烟厂, 武汉 430000;
    4. 四川省烟草公司凉山州公司, 四川 西昌 615000
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-07 出版日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2020-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 凌爱芬(1982-), 女, 河南淅川人, 农艺师, 硕士, 主要从事烟草栽培研究, (电话)18838933275(电子信箱)1036791930@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:石刚(1980-), 男, 浙江宁波人, 农艺师, 主要从事烟叶基地技术管理工作, (电话)15972997337(电子信箱)1204527005@qq.com;
  • 基金资助:
    湖北中烟工业有限责任公司“以‘中棵烟+高油分’为中心的基地烟叶生产关键技术研究”(2018420000340359)

Analysis on chemical component and sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco in Huidong county

SHI Gang1, ZHAO Xiao-chao1, PAN Hao-dong2, ZHANG Zhen2, FU Long3, WANG Bao-xiang1, WANG Jian1, LING Ai-fen4   

  1. 1. China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Llc, Wuhan 430000, China;
    2. Tobacco Science College, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
    3. Hubei Zhongyan Wuhan Cigarette Factory, Wuhan 430000, China;
    4.Sichuan Tobacco Company Liangshan Prefecture Company, Xichang 615000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2019-11-07 Online:2020-06-10 Published:2020-08-06

摘要: 采用统计分析方法, 对会东烟区2014—2018年共计350个初烤烟叶B2F、C3F样品的主要化学成分和感官质量进行了变异性分析, 结果表明, 会东烤烟化学成分的平均值基本都在优质烟化学成分适宜范围内。总糖、还原糖含量高于平均值;氯含量和钾/氯的变异系数最大;总糖、还原糖和总氮的变异系数较小。主要化学成分变异性在各年度表现不同, 各年份各部位等级烟叶主要化学成分含量变异不同。会东烤烟化学成分在年度间差异明显。会东烤烟香气质和刺激性的变异系数较大, 柔和度、细腻感、圆润度和干燥感的变异系数较低, 烤烟的抽吸感较稳定。年度内烤烟B2F和C3F的各项感官质量变异系数在2014年均较大, 在2018年较小。

关键词: 烤烟, 化学成分, 感官质量, 变异, 会东县

Abstract: Variability of chemical component contents and sensory quality between 2014 and 2018 was statistically analyzed by 350 of flue-cured tobacco samples with grades of B2F and C3F from Huidong county. The results showed that, in average, chemical components of flue-cured tobacco were almost in normal range of high quality flue-cured tobacco, the contents of total sugar and reducing sugar were higher than the average. The variation coefficients of chlorine content and potassium chlorine ratio were the largest, while the variation coefficients of total sugar, reducing sugar and total nitrogen were smaller. There existed obvious variation among chemical components of different grades in different years. The variation coefficients of aroma quality and irritability of flue-cured tobacco in Huidong county were large. The variation coefficients of softness, delicacy, roundness and dryness are low. Smoking sensation of flue-cured tobacco is stable. The variation coefficients of sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco B2F and C3F were larger in 2014 and smaller in 2018.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, chemical components, sensory quality, variation, Huidong county

中图分类号: