基于条件价值法的古建筑价值评估

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.03.034

湖北农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 154-157.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.03.034

基于条件价值法的古建筑价值评估

李敏

湖南公信房地产评估经纪有限公司,湖南常德 415000

收稿日期:2019-05-07 发布日期:2020-05-11
作者简介:李敏（1988-）,女,湖南湘阴人,硕士,主要从事不动产估价工作,（电话）18274828870（电子信箱）274193082@qq.com。
基金资助:
湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目（18YBQ097）

Evaluation of ancient architecture value based on contingent valuation method

LI Min

Hunan Gongxin Real Estate Valuation Brokerage Company Ltd.,Changde 415000,Hunan,China

Received:2019-05-07 Published:2020-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 古建筑不仅具有经济价值,而且具有历史、文化、审美等价值,全面评估其真实价值有利于保护古建筑。以龙山县某古建筑为例,调查民众对该古建筑保护和修缮的支付意愿,采用条件价值法测算古建筑的价值。结果表明,68.45%受访者对保护和修缮古建筑有支付意愿;受访者对古建筑保护和修缮的平均支付意愿额度为13.812元;基于条件价值法测算得到古建筑的价值比成本法测算的价值高14.78%。因此,条件价值法是评估古建筑价值的一种合理可行的方法。

关键词: 古建筑, 价值评估, 条件价值法, 支付意愿

Abstract: Ancient buildings not only have economic value, but also have historical, cultural, aesthetic and other values. A comprehensive assessment of their true value is conducive to the protection of ancient buildings. Taking an ancient building in Longshan county as an example, the public's willingness to pay for the protection and repair of the ancient building was investigated, and the value of the ancient building was measured using conditional value method. The results show that 68.45% of the respondents are willing to pay to protect and repair ancient buildings; respondents' average willingness to pay for the protection and repair of ancient buildings was 13.812 yuan; the value of the ancient building calculated based on the conditional value method is 14.78% higher than that measured by the cost method. Therefore, the conditional value method is a reasonable and feasible method for evaluating the value of ancient buildings.

Key words: ancient architecture, value evaluation, contingent valuation method, willingness to pay

中图分类号:

F293.3

李敏. 基于条件价值法的古建筑价值评估[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(3): 154-157.

LI Min. Evaluation of ancient architecture value based on contingent valuation method[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 59(3): 154-157.

参考文献

[1] LEE S L.Urban conservation policy and the preservation of historical and cultural heritage:The case of Singapore[J].Cities,1996,13(6):399-409.
[2] 徐进亮. 古建筑价值评估研究——以苏南古民居为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.
[3] 李侦,雷冬霞.历史建筑价值认识的发展及其保护的经济学因素[J].同济大学学报,2009(10):44-51.
[4] MINORS C.Listed buildings and conservation areas[M].London:Longman,1989.
[5] 张祖群. 汉长安城的文化、经济价值分析与遗产保护[D].西安:西北大学,2005.
[6] LOOMIS J B,WALSH R C.Recreation economic decisions,comparing benefits and costs[M].Pennsylvania:Venture publishing,Inc,1997.
[7] 顾江. 文化遗产经济学[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2009.
[8] 李玲娇. 基于模糊数学理论的古建筑震后评估方法研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
[9] 许抄军. 历史文化古城游憩利用价值及非利用价值评估方法与案例研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2004.
[10] 张艳华. 在文化价值和经济价值之间——上海城市建筑遗产(CBH)保护与再利用[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2007.
[11] PURCELL A T,NASAR J L.Experiencing other people's houses:A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience[J].Journal of environmental psychology,1992,12(3):199-211.
[12] BEDATE A,HERRERO L C,LARA J S.Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain[J].Journal of cultural heritage,2004,5(1):101-111.
[13] 薛明月,肖景义,高丽文,等.湖泊型旅游景区经济价值综合评估——以青海湖景区为例[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2018,41(1):241-247.
[14] 谭超. 应用CVM方法评估工业遗产的非使用价值——以北京焦化厂遗址为例[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2009(3):323-328.
[15] 董雪旺,张捷,刘传华,等.条件价值法中的偏差分析及信度和效度检验——以九寨沟游憩价值评估为例[J].地理学报,2011, 66(2):267-278.
[16] ARROW K,SOLOW R,PORTNEY P R,et al.Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation[J].Federal register,1993, 32(1):48-56.
[17] 张志强,徐中明,程国栋,等.黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):885-893.
[18] 马文博,李世平,陈昱.基于CVM的耕地保护经济补偿探析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(11):7-11.
[19] DE GROOT R S,WILSON M A,BOUMANS R M J. A typology for the classification,description and valuation of ecosystem functions,goods and services[J].Ecological economics,2002, 41(3):393-408.
[20] KRITROM B.Spike model in contingent valuation[J].American journal of agricultural economics,1991,79(4):1013-1023.

基于条件价值法的古建筑价值评估

Evaluation of ancient architecture value based on contingent valuation method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程颜, 谭淑豪. 兼业视角下农户对天气指数保险的支付意愿研究--基于湖北荆州和潜江稻虾共作农户的调研数据[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(5): 156-161.
[2]	庞静. 财务分析视角下农产品区域公用品牌价值评估[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(18): 198-202.
[3]	估海斌, 党国英. 农户生活垃圾治理支付意愿及影响因素分析——以山西省临汾市尧都区为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(9): 182-187.