氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系水分吸收的影响机制

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2018.21.012

湖北农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (21): 51-56.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2018.21.012

氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系水分吸收的影响机制

杨秀霞², 燕辉, 商庆银, 周春火, 郭世伟²

1.江西农业大学,a.国土资源与环境学院;
b.农学院,南昌 330045;
2南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,南京 210095

收稿日期:2018-02-08 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2020-01-13
通讯作者: 郭世伟,教授,主要从事水稻氮素营养生理研究,（电子信箱）sguo@njau.edu.cn。
作者简介:杨秀霞（1983-）,女,河南太康人,讲师,博士,主要从事水稻氮素营养生理研究,（电话）13330061230（电子信箱）yangxiuxia11@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31460540; 30871587）

Effects of Nitrogen Forms and Water Stress on the Water Absorption of Root Systems Among the Different Rice Cultivars

YANG Xiu-xia², YAN Hui, SHANG Qing-yin, ZHOU Chun-huo, GUO Shi-wei²

1a.College of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences;
1b.College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China;
2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China

Received:2018-02-08 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2020-01-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用室内营养液培养及PEG6000模拟水分胁迫的方法,研究不同形态氮素营养（铵态氮和硝态氮）和水分条件对4种基因型水稻汕优63、扬稻6号、86优8、武运粳7号根系生理特性和水分吸收途径的影响。结果表明,在2种水分条件下,供铵营养水稻整株生物量均显著高于硝营养水稻,在水分胁迫条件下表现出较强的抗旱性。水分胁迫条件下供铵态氮营养水稻的根系具有较高的根系活力、吸收面积和水分吸收能力。在非水分胁迫条件下,供铵态氮和硝态氮营养水稻根系水分吸收和运输途径相同;水分胁迫后,硝营养水稻的水分运输途径以运输阻力较大的质外体途径为主,尤其在粳稻品种中表现显著。就不同基因型水稻品种而言,籼稻品种在供铵态氮营养时地上部干重显著高于粳稻品种,且籼稻品种在水分胁迫条件下供铵态氮营养时根系总吸收面积、活跃吸收面积和根系活力也显著高于粳稻品种,表现出较强的水分吸收能力。

关键词: 水分胁迫, 氮素形态, 水稻（Oryza sativa L.）, 水分吸收

Abstract: In order to study the effects of different nitrogen forms and water stress on physiological characteristics and water absorption pathway of root system,hydroponic experiment was conducted in a greenhouse. Water stress was simulated by treatment with polyethylene glycol（PEG6000）. Four rice（Oryza sativa L.） genotypic varieties （Shanyou 63,Yangdao 6,86you 8 and Wuyunjing 7） were utilized in the experiments. The results showed that regardless of water conditions,rice biomass was higher in the plants supplied with ammonium nutrition than that in nitrate nutrition. Under water stress condition, root activity, absorption area and water uptake ability were higher in the plants supplied with ammonium nutrition than that in nitrate nutrition. Regardless of water status, water uptake and transport were mainly through cell-cell passway in the plants supplied with ammonium nutrition; as for the plants supplied with nitrate nutrition, they were mainly through cell-cell pathway under non-water stress condition and throught apoplastic pathway under water stress condition. Compared with non-water stress condition, water stress significantly stimulated root growth in both N forms, and the stimulation was higher in nitrate nutrition. As to indica rice,water stress had no negative effects on shoot biomass and tillers in the plants supplied with ammonium nutrition, while significantly decreased them in nitrate nutrition. As to japonica rice, water stress significantly decreased shoot biomass and tillers in both N forms.

Key words: water stress, nitrogen form, rice （Oryza sativa L.）, water uptake

中图分类号:

S511

杨秀霞, 燕辉, 商庆银, 周春火, 郭世伟. 氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系水分吸收的影响机制[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(21): 51-56.

YANG Xiu-xia, YAN Hui, SHANG Qing-yin, ZHOU Chun-huo, GUO Shi-wei. Effects of Nitrogen Forms and Water Stress on the Water Absorption of Root Systems Among the Different Rice Cultivars[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2018, 57(21): 51-56.

参考文献 26

[1]	茆智. 水稻节水灌溉及其对环境的影响[J].中国工程科学,2002,4(7):8-16.
[2]	程建平,曹凑贵,蔡明历,等.水分胁迫与氮素营养对水稻生理特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(11):149-154.
[3]	MAKINO A,SATO T,NAKANO H,et al.Leaf photosynthesis,plant growth and nitrogen allocation in rice under different irradiances[J].Planta,1997,203:390-398.
[4]	MIYAMOTO N,STEUDLE E,HIRASAWA T,et al.Hydraulic conductivity of rice roots[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2001,52:1835-1846.
[5]	周毅,郭世伟,沈其荣.局部根系干旱条件下分蘖期水稻对供氮形态的生物学响应[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):169-173.
[6]	吴芳,高迎旭,宋娜,等氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系生理特性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2008,31(1):63-66.
[7]	于秋菊,吴锜,林忠平.植物水孔蛋白研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(6):855-866.
[8]	沈玉芳,王保莉,曲东,等.水分胁迫下磷营养对玉米苗期根系导水率的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2002,30(5):11-15.
[9]	李善菊,任小林.植物水分胁迫下功能蛋白的研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(3):64-69.
[10]	宋娜,郭世伟,沈其荣.不同氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻苗期水分吸收、光合作用及生长的影响[J].植物学通报,2007,24(4):477-483.
[11]	LU Z,NEUMANN P M.Water-stressed maize,barley and rice seedlings show species diversity in mechanisms of leaf growth inhibition[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1998,49(329):1945-1952.
[12]	张雄. 用TTC(红四氮唑)法测定小麦根和花粉活力及其应用[J].植物生理学通讯,1982,(3):48-50.
[13]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验技术[J].西安:世界图书出版公司,2000.
[14]	周利民,罗怀彬,古璇清.水稻节水灌溉机理研究[J].广东水利水电,2003(2):22-24.
[15]	ASCH F,DINGKUHN M,SOW A,et al.Drought-induced changes in rooting patterns and assimilate partitioning between root and shoot in upland rice[J].Field Crop Research,2005, 93:223-236.
[16]	TURNER N C.Adaption to water deficits:A changeing perspective[J].J Aust Plant Physiol,1986,13:175-190.
[17]	张岁歧,山仑.氮素营养对春小麦抗旱适应及水分利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(1):31-35.
[18]	景蕊莲. 作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(2):79-85.
[19]	孙国钧,张荣,李凤民,等.作物抗旱性、水分利用与籽粒产量的形成[J].资源科学,1999,21(5):31-36.
[20]	RANATHUNGE K,KOTULA L,STEUDLE E,et al.Water permeability and reflection coefficient of the outer part of young rice roots are differently affected by closure of water channels (aquaporins) or blockage of apoplastic pores[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2004,396,433-447.
[21]	STEUDLE E,HENZLER T.Water channels in plants:Do basic concepts of water transport change?[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1995,46:1067-1076.
[22]	SMITH J A C,NOBEL P S. Water movement and storage in a desert succulent:Anatomy and rehydration kinetics for leaves of Agave deserti[J].Journal of Experiment Botany,1986,37:1044-1053.
[23]	MAGGIO A,JOLY R J.Effects of mercuric chloride on the hydraulic conductivity of tomato root systems. Evidence for a channel-mediated water pathway[J].Plant Physiology,1995,109:331-335.
[24]	SCHUTZ K,TYERMAN S D.Water channels in Chara coralline[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1997,48(313):1511-1518.
[25]	段英华,张亚丽,沈其荣.增硝营养对不同基因型水稻苗期吸铵和生长的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(2):260-265.
[26]	李勇,周毅,郭世伟,等.铵态氮和硝态氮营养对水、旱稻根系形态及水分吸收的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2007,21(3):294-298.

氮素形态及水分胁迫对水稻根系水分吸收的影响机制

Effects of Nitrogen Forms and Water Stress on the Water Absorption of Root Systems Among the Different Rice Cultivars

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭成林, 袁家富, 马朝红, 杨小红, 佀国涵, 李金华, 刘威, 谢媛园. 湖北省稻虾共作典型区域水稻施肥现状评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(7): 30-33.
[2]	黄紫萱, 熊艳珍, 马慧琴, 程建峰. 有色稻米种质及环境因素对其色泽影响的研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(3): 5-10.
[3]	金桂秀. 山东省水稻品种资源品质与食味初探[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(11): 19-23.
[4]	吴芸紫, 张华, 谢磊, 徐正猛, 徐国华, 许晖. 20个水稻品种稻虾栽培比较试验结果及评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(10): 15-17.
[5]	吕亮, 常向前, 王佐乾, 杨小林, 张舒. 湖北省20份水稻主栽品种抗病虫性的田间观察[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(10): 77-81.
[6]	杨康, 张枝盛, 瞿和平, 刘伟, 杨汉, 秦晓银, 黄志谋. 冷浸田改良对水稻根系发育及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(1): 17-19.
[7]	夏明元, 李进波, 戚华雄. 水稻广亲和品系HDH73的创制和鉴定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(24): 21-23.
[8]	李进波, 杜雪树, 夏明元, 万丙良, 戚华雄. 分子标记辅助选择培育抗稻瘟病和抗褐飞虱多基因聚合的水稻恢复系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(23): 24-27.
[9]	陈杰, 陈展鹏, 涂军明, 蔡正军, 曹志刚, 张群, 金红梅, 张文超, 李成芳, 华红霞, 蔡万伦. 高档优质稻黄科香5号轻简化直播栽培技术及绿色防控技术集成[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(23): 46-47.
[10]	杨扬, 高莉莉, 张慧, 吕晓. 不同淹水处理对水稻体内砷富集的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(23): 58-62.
[11]	安琪, 季雯珺, 何永刚, 章志宏. 水稻成蘖特性及相关氮同化酶活性、基因表达分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(23): 174-179.
[12]	王春虎, 穆麒麟, 王松, 田小海. 从现有商业品种中筛选耐高温水稻品种[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(20): 25-28.
[13]	侯玲, 罗艳萍, 侯晓静, 罗冬玉, 韦巧, 李洪菊, 周家华, 靳德明, 王富, 王雄. 几种抗旱剂在水稻生产抗旱减损中的应用效果比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(17): 16-18.
[14]	赵丽君, 黄影华, 张善炫, 郭之瑶, 洪瑞霞, 王轶林, 夏丽莎, 李艳大, 陈青春. 不同氮肥梯度处理水稻茎蘖数及株高变化规律[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12): 13-16.
[15]	高加明, 张继光, 任晓红, 丁才夫, 李方明, 申国明, 高林, 刘跃东, 王大彬. 不同氮素配比对烤烟生长发育和养分累积及上部烟叶化学成分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12): 94-98.